EuraStudy
Equalisation (EQ) boosts or cuts chosen frequency regions to shape the tone of a sound and carve space in a mix. This topic sets EQ against the frequency spectrum, then builds up the tools: pass filters and their slope, shelving and bell curves, the full parametric EQ with its gain, frequency and Q controls (including the narrow notch that removes mains hum), and the fixed-band graphic EQ. It closes with the practical judgement of corrective versus creative EQ.
5 sections~19 min reading time3 competenciesLevel Foundation 1 · Standard 3 · Advanced 1
basic level
The AS foundation is what EQ does, pass filters, and shelving and bell EQ.
higher level
The full A-level adds Q and bandwidth, the parametric notch, graphic EQ and corrective-versus-creative judgement.
Reading depth: In depth
Text size: Standard
EQ regions across the spectrum
A mix is muddy, its vocal is dull, and a cymbal is harsh. State the region and the move (cut or boost) for each.
Mud lives in the low-mids; cut around 250-400 Hz on the offending track(s) to clear it.
Intelligibility and air sit in the presence region; a gentle boost around 3-5 kHz (and a little high-shelf air) brightens the vocal.
Harshness sits in the upper-mids; a narrow cut around 3-5 kHz tames the cymbal without dulling its sparkle.
Two of the three are cuts, reflecting that removing an offending region is often cleaner than boosting and helps reduce masking.
Result: Cut ~300 Hz for the mud, boost ~4 kHz for the dull vocal, cut ~4 kHz for the harsh cymbal - heard problems mapped to spectral moves.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Name the approximate frequency region you would address to fix (a) a muddy mix, (b) a dull, unintelligible vocal, and (c) a harsh cymbal, and say whether you would cut or boost.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Music Technology (9MT0) Specification (Pearson Edexcel)
High-pass and low-pass filter responses
A vocal track carries floor rumble and low-frequency mud but the voice itself has nothing useful below about 100 Hz. Choose the filter, cut-off and slope.
Use a high-pass (low-cut) filter, which passes the voice above the cut-off and removes the rumble below it.
Set the cut-off around 90-100 Hz, below the voice's useful low frequencies, so the rumble is removed without thinning the voice.
A moderate slope (12-18 dB/octave) removes the rumble decisively while sounding natural; a very steep slope is unnecessary here.
Solo the vocal and confirm the rumble is gone and the voice's warmth is intact; nudge the cut-off down if the voice thins.
Result: A high-pass filter around 90-100 Hz at a moderate slope removes the rumble and mud while leaving the voice's body untouched.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
State which pass filter, and roughly what cut-off and slope, you would use to remove low-frequency rumble from a vocal track without thinning the voice.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Music Technology (9MT0) Specification (Pearson Edexcel)
Shelf and bell EQ curves
You want to (a) add a smooth sense of air across the whole top of a mix and (b) remove a specific resonant ring at 500 Hz on a snare. Choose the EQ shape and settings for each.
Use a high shelf: set its corner around 10 kHz and boost a few decibels so the entire top end lifts smoothly for air, rather than a single band.
Use a bell (dip): set the frequency to 500 Hz, a negative gain to cut it, and a high Q so the cut is narrow and surgical, removing the ring without dulling the surrounding sound.
The air is a broad tilt (a shelf's job), the ring is a single precise frequency (a narrow bell's job).
Sweep to find the exact ring frequency first, then narrow the Q and cut; check the snare keeps its body.
Result: A high shelf around 10 kHz adds broad air; a narrow high-Q bell cut at 500 Hz removes the specific ring - shape matched to the move.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
State whether a shelf or a bell, and roughly what frequency, you would use to (a) add overall air to a mix and (b) remove a specific resonant ring at 500 Hz.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Music Technology (9MT0) Specification (Pearson Edexcel)
Parametric notches on mains hum
A UK vocal recording has an audible 50 Hz mains hum with harmonics. Specify the parametric EQ settings to remove it cleanly.
UK mains hum is at 50 Hz with harmonics at 100 Hz, 150 Hz (and possibly 200 Hz); these exact frequencies are the targets.
Create a band at 50 Hz with a deep cut (around -20 dB or more) and a high Q (narrow bandwidth) so only the hum is removed; repeat at 100 and 150 Hz.
A high Q is essential: a wide cut would remove musical low-frequency content around 50 Hz as well, but a narrow notch takes only the hum tone.
Note that a North American recording would use 60 Hz and its harmonics (120, 180 Hz) instead - always tune to the local mains frequency.
Result: Narrow high-Q notches with deep cuts at 50, 100 and 150 Hz remove the UK mains hum and its harmonics while leaving the music intact (60/120/180 Hz in North America).
Typical mistakes
Active revision
A UK recording has a 50 Hz mains hum. Describe the exact parametric EQ settings (frequency, gain, Q) to remove it and its main harmonics without harming the music.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Music Technology (9MT0) Specification (Pearson Edexcel)
EQ types and their uses
Choose the right EQ for (a) quickly reducing feedback across a live PA system and (b) removing one precise ringing frequency from a recorded tom.
Use a graphic EQ: its many fixed bands as sliders give a fast, visual way to pull down the several frequencies that feed back across the whole system.
Use a parametric EQ: sweep a high-Q bell to find the exact ringing frequency, then cut it with a narrow notch - precision the graphic's fixed bands cannot match.
The graphic wins on speed and overview across many bands; the parametric wins on precisely targeting one frequency and width.
Match the tool to the task: broad, fast, many-band work to the graphic; precise, single-frequency work to the parametric.
Result: A graphic EQ for the fast, many-band PA taming and a parametric EQ for the one precise tom resonance - overview versus precision.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
State whether a graphic or a parametric EQ suits (a) quickly taming feedback across a live PA and (b) removing one precise resonant frequency from a recorded tom, and justify each.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Music Technology (9MT0) Specification (Pearson Edexcel) · Ofqual - GCE AS and A level qualifications (subject-level conditions and requirements) (Ofqual)
References & sources