EuraStudy
This topic carries Paper 2 Section C, the written response to a prescribed film. It is attempted only by candidates who have answered on one literary text in Section B: a student answers either on two literary texts, both in Section B, or on one literary text and one film, one essay in each section. Two films is not permitted, and it is not possible to reach Section C without a Section B literary essay. The film essay is worth 45 marks like its neighbour, is marked by the same three grids — critical and analytical response for AO4, range of grammatical structures and vocabulary for AO3, accuracy of language for AO3 — offers a choice of two questions, and shares the same recommended length of approximately 300 to 350 words and the same prohibition on taking any documentation into the examination. Appendix 1 lists four films: Abril Despedaçado, directed by Walter Salles, 2001; A Canção de Lisboa, directed by Pedro Varela, 2016; Os gatos não têm vertigens, directed by António-Pedro Vasconcelos, 2014; and Que horas ela volta?, directed by Anna Muylaert, 2015. Prescribed lists are the board's and are revised between issues, so confirm the list current for your own series. These notes teach method, name no plot detail that is not documented, and invent no dialogue.
5 sections~38 min reading time2 competenciesLevel Standard 2 · Advanced 3
basic level
At first-year standard the expectation is a structured response showing the film has been watched attentively: an answer to the question set, evidence taken from specific scenes rather than from a plot summary, and Portuguese that is comprehensible and broadly accurate across several hundred words.
higher level
The full A-Level expects the film treated as a made object rather than as a story: technique named and used as evidence, scenes located and described rather than narrated, arguments developed and justified, and conclusions drawn — in Portuguese with deliberate structural range and controlled accuracy, planned and written in about sixty-five minutes with no documentation available.
Reading depth: In depth
Text size: Standard
Film vocabulary and the claim each term licenses
A paragraph of the kind that scores in the middle bands: Nesta cena, a personagem chega a casa e encontra a família à mesa. Ninguém fala com ela. Depois ela sai e vai para o quarto. Isto mostra que ela está sozinha. Rewrite it using the technique vocabulary, changing nothing about what happens.
Three sentences of plot and one flat conclusion. Everything in it is true of the scene and none of it is about the film as a made object: there is no framing, no shot, no sound, no editing, and the analytical verb mostrar arrives once, at the end, attached to a claim — she is alone — that the plot alone already established. The AO4 grid would read this as description, and correctly.
Start from the shot rather than from the action. A cena abre num plano geral que coloca a personagem à entrada, à distância da mesa onde a família está sentada. Now the same event carries a claim: the framing itself puts distance between her and them. Colocar a personagem à distância de is doing analytical work in ordinary words. Note that the description remains accurate to what happens — nothing has been invented — and that it is now about a choice made by the film.
O silêncio não é vazio: é preenchido pelo som ambiente da refeição, que continua sem interrupção. Silence used as a technique term rather than as a report that nobody spoke. Preenchido pelo som ambiente names what is actually on the soundtrack. Sem interrupção is the point — the meal's continuing sound is what makes the silence pointed. If the scene you are writing about does not work this way, the sentence must be different, and this is exactly why the method requires having watched attentively rather than remembering a plot.
O corte para o quarto é imediato, sem plano de transição, o que faz da saída da personagem menos uma decisão do que uma consequência. O corte and plano de transição are technique terms; o que faz de X menos Y do que Z is a comparative construction from Appendix 2's list carrying a real analytical claim. This sentence replaces depois ela sai e vai para o quarto with an argument about how the film presents that departure, which is the difference between the middle bands and the top ones.
A solidão da personagem não é, portanto, enunciada: é construída pelo enquadramento, pelo som e pela montagem. Não é enunciada, é construída is the essay's whole method in one sentence, and the three nouns at the end name the three techniques the paragraph actually used. The claim is the same as the original paragraph's — she is alone — but it now arrives as a conclusion from evidence rather than as a restatement of the plot, and the paragraph contains five technique terms distributed across four sentences.
Result: A cena abre num plano geral que coloca a personagem à entrada, à distância da mesa onde a família está sentada. O silêncio não é vazio: é preenchido pelo som ambiente da refeição, que continua sem interrupção. O corte para o quarto é imediato, sem plano de transição, o que faz da saída da personagem menos uma decisão do que uma consequência. A sua solidão não é, portanto, enunciada: é construída pelo enquadramento, pelo som e pela montagem.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Watch any ten minutes of the film your centre has chosen with a notebook and write down, for each scene, one technique you can name in Portuguese and one claim it licenses. Ten scenes, twenty lines. Then close the notebook and write the same list from memory. What survives is what you will have in the examination, and if the technique terms do not survive, learn the terms before you rewatch anything.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Portuguese (9PG0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)
The question type: Analise o modo como o filme apresenta as relações entre as personagens. Build one paragraph on a pattern rather than on a single scene, on a film deliberately left unnamed so that the structure is what transfers.
O filme constrói as relações entre as personagens menos através do diálogo do que através da forma como as coloca, ou não, dentro do mesmo plano. Menos através de … do que através de is the comparative frame again. The claim is about a pattern — how characters are framed together or apart — and it announces that the paragraph will be about a system rather than about a moment. Ou não, set off by commas, is doing precise work: the absence of shared framing is part of the pattern.
Logo na primeira sequência, duas personagens conversam sem que a câmara as reúna: cada uma ocupa o seu plano. Logo na primeira sequência locates. Sem que takes the subjunctive reúna. Cada uma ocupa o seu plano is a plain, accurate description of a shot-reverse-shot pattern in ordinary Portuguese that needs no technical jargon to be precise. Nothing is invented here beyond what the method requires you to have observed in the film you actually watched.
A meio do filme, a mesma disposição repete-se, mas com uma diferença: uma das personagens entra agora no plano da outra, sem que esta o registe. Repetir-se establishes the pattern; mas com uma diferença names the variation, which is where the argument lives. A variation on a repeated pattern is the single most persuasive kind of film evidence, because it demonstrates that you watched the whole film attentively and it produces a claim that no plot summary could supply.
A relação é, portanto, descrita visualmente antes de ser dita: a aproximação de uma personagem e a indiferença da outra ficam estabelecidas sem uma única linha de diálogo que as enuncie. Antes de ser dita is a plus infinitive after the preposition. Ficar estabelecido is the state passive from the grammar topic, correctly used: the relationship stands established, and the sentence does not say who established it, which is right because the film did. This is the analytical payoff and it took two located occurrences to earn.
Este princípio — a informação sobre as relações passa pelo enquadramento e não pelas palavras — atravessa o filme inteiro, e é o que torna as poucas cenas de confronto verbal tão abruptas. Atravessar o filme inteiro is a general claim, and it is safe only because two occurrences have been evidenced; generalising from one would be over-reading. The final clause connects the pattern to something else in the film, which is what makes a paragraph feel like part of an argument rather than a self-contained observation.
Result: Paragraph shape: (1) the pattern stated as the claim, using a comparative frame; (2) the first occurrence located early and described in two clauses; (3) the second occurrence located mid-film, with the variation named — this is where the argument lives; (4) the analytical turn, using a state passive; (5) a careful generalisation, earned by two occurrences, connected to something else in the film. No dialogue quoted, no visual detail invented, and evidence that no plot summary could have supplied.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Rewatch your film once with a single task: find three patterns. A recurring object, a repeated framing, a piece of music used twice, a colour that changes across the film, a line of behaviour that echoes. For each, note where it occurs — twice at least — and what the variation between occurrences is. Then write one paragraph in Portuguese on each, using the locate-describe-claim shape. Those three paragraphs are worth more in an examination than any amount of plot recall.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Portuguese (9PG0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)
The question type: Em que medida o contexto social é determinante no filme que estudou? Show how a setting paragraph is built so that it argues, on a film deliberately unnamed.
O contexto social não é, neste filme, um pano de fundo: é aquilo que torna a história possível e, ao mesmo tempo, aquilo que a limita. Um pano de fundo is a backdrop, and the não é X: é Y frame states the claim. Naming the setting as both enabling and limiting is a two-sided claim, which is what a paragraph needs if it is to develop rather than to assert. Em que medida in the question invites exactly this kind of qualified answer.
A ação decorre num meio urbano concreto, num período identificável, e o filme não o disfarça. Precision here means naming what your film actually specifies — a city, a decade, a kind of neighbourhood — and the notes deliberately do not supply it, because inventing a setting for an unnamed film would be exactly the fabrication this topic warns against. Decorrer is the standard verb for where and when the action takes place. Não o disfarça is a claim about the film's own attitude to its setting.
A posição social das personagens nunca é enunciada: percebe-se pelo espaço em que vivem, pelo trabalho que fazem e pelo modo como se dirigem umas às outras. Nunca é enunciada, percebe-se is the same structural contrast the film-technique section used, and it is the most useful sentence shape in the whole topic. Dirigir-se a alguém is to address someone, and modes of address are a genuine marker of social position in Portuguese — tu, você, o senhor — which makes this a claim about language as well as about setting.
É significativo que o filme escolha mostrar as deslocações entre esses espaços e não apenas os espaços em si: o tempo gasto a atravessar a cidade é ele próprio uma informação social. É significativo que takes the subjunctive escolha. The argument is from a selection — the film shows journeys, not only destinations — and it converts a formal observation into a social claim. O tempo gasto a atravessar is a plus infinitive after tempo, and ele próprio is the emphatic pronoun.
Seria exagerado, ainda assim, dizer que o contexto determina inteiramente as personagens: o filme dá-lhes margem, e é nessa margem que a história acontece. Seria exagerado is the conditional, hedging appropriately. Ainda assim is a concessive connective. Dar margem a alguém is to give someone room. The final cleft, é nessa margem que, resolves the two-sided claim made in the first sentence, which is what makes the paragraph a movement rather than a statement — and answering em que medida with a measured rather than an absolute answer is what the question asked for.
Result: Paragraph shape: (1) the setting stated as a claim, two-sided — enabling and limiting; (2) the setting named precisely in one clause, from the film you actually watched; (3) the social position shown rather than stated, with modes of address as linguistic evidence; (4) an argument from a selection the film made, using é significativo que with the subjunctive; (5) a qualification in the conditional, resolving the two-sided claim with a cleft. The question em que medida is answered with a measure, not with a yes.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
For the film your centre has chosen, write one page in Portuguese answering five questions precisely: in what country and what period is it set; urban or rural, and where; what social position do the principal figures occupy and how does the film show it rather than state it; what variety of Portuguese is spoken and does that carry meaning; and what does the film conspicuously not show. The fifth question is the one most likely to produce a paragraph nobody else writes.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Portuguese (9PG0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)
You are about to watch the prescribed film for the first time as a student rather than as a viewer. Design the note-taking so that what you produce is usable in an examination nine months later with no documentation permitted.
Notes in English will have to be translated under pressure and will be translated badly. Write in Portuguese even if the Portuguese is imperfect, because the point is to rehearse the vocabulary you will need. Three columns: onde na narrativa, o que se vê e se ouve, que técnica. The third column is the one that must never be left empty, because it is the one that will not be recoverable later.
A timestamp is useless in an examination; a narrative location is not. Write na cena de abertura, depois do primeiro confronto, imediatamente antes do regresso, na última sequência. Those phrases are what you will use in the essay itself, so writing them now is rehearsal rather than administration. Ten to fifteen located scenes is the right number — enough to select from, few enough to memorise.
A first viewing yields scenes; only a second yields patterns, because a pattern is only visible once you know what recurs. On the second viewing, ignore the plot entirely and track three things: what returns, what changes when it returns, and what is conspicuously absent. Two or three patterns, each with two located occurrences, is the highest-value material in the whole bank and the material no summary can supply.
A scene attached to one claim is usable if that question comes up. A scene attached to two — one about a character, one about a theme or a technique — is usable for twice as many questions. Do this at the end of each viewing session while the scene is fresh, not months later. Beside each, note the one technique term the scene lets you use, since that is the term you will need to have automatic.
Once a month, set yourself a theme and write three located scenes bearing on it, in Portuguese, in five minutes, with your notes closed. This is the only test that predicts examination performance, because it reproduces the examination condition exactly: no documentation, retrieval rather than recognition, and Portuguese under time. Whatever fails the test goes back into active revision; whatever survives it is what you will actually have.
Result: The bank: ten to fifteen scenes, each with a narrative location phrase rather than a timestamp, each described in Portuguese in two or three clauses, each carrying one named technique and two possible claims; plus two or three patterns from a second viewing, each with two located occurrences and the variation between them named; all rehearsed monthly by generation with the notes closed.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Sit both essays in one session against a two-hour-ten-minute clock, with a hard stop at sixty-five minutes for the first. Note what you had to abandon and what the second essay gained from the time. Then repeat a fortnight later, having adjusted your plan rather than your speed. Most candidates find the first essay loses almost nothing and the second gains a whole band.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Portuguese (9PG0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)
A candidate has written: Na cena final, a personagem principal voltou para casa e a câmara ficou parada durante muito tempo. Eu vejo que o realizador queria mostrar que ela estava sozinho. O filme foi muito importante e a assistência assistiu ele com emoção. Run the accuracy pass and explain each correction.
Voltou and ficou are past tenses describing what happens in the film and must be present: volta, fica. Queria describes the director's supposed intention and will be removed anyway. Estava should be está. Three corrections in one sentence, all of the same type, which is why a dedicated tense pass finds them faster than reading for meaning would. Na cena final, a personagem principal volta para casa e a câmara fica parada durante muito tempo.
Ela estava sozinho is the classic error: the adjective has been made to agree with the character's apparent gender rather than with the feminine noun a personagem. It must be sozinha. Note that even if the character is male, a personagem principal está sozinha is what Portuguese requires, which is counter-intuitive and worth checking specifically every time. This single check is worth doing on every adjective in the essay.
Eu vejo que o realizador queria mostrar is wrong on two counts. Eu vejo is the wrong register — analysis uses vê-se, nota-se or percebe-se — and o realizador queria mostrar asserts an intention that cannot be evidenced from the film. Replace both at once: Vê-se que o plano prolongado sublinha a sua solidão. The claim is now about what the film does, the register is impersonal, and a technique term has appeared where there was none.
A assistência assistiu ele contains two errors. Assistir takes a with its object in European Portuguese, so assistir a ele — but with a film the natural object is the film, and a pronoun would be a ele or better simply repeat: a assistência assistiu ao filme. The sentence also uses muito importante, the empty evaluative the literary topic warned about. Replace with something that says what kind of importance: o filme teve uma receção assinalável, in the past, correctly, because reception is a fact about the world rather than about the film.
The rewritten paragraph is not more ambitious in vocabulary than the original — plano prolongado, solidão, receção assinalável are all ordinary words — but it is correct in tense throughout, correct in agreement, correct in register, and it contains a technique term and an impersonal construction that were absent. That is the trade this section recommends: keep the nouns concrete, spend the risk budget on structures, and use the checking pass mechanically rather than aesthetically. Four passes, about ten minutes, and several accuracy marks recovered.
Result: Na cena final, a personagem principal volta para casa e a câmara fica parada durante muito tempo. Vê-se que o plano prolongado sublinha a sua solidão, sem que nada seja dito. O filme teve, aliás, uma receção assinalável junto do público.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Take one page of your own film writing and run three mechanical checks in order, without reading for meaning: every verb describing the film in the present, every adjective attached to personagem feminine, and every assistir followed by a. Then count your impersonal reflexives; if there are none, rewrite two sentences to use them. Twelve minutes, three passes, and it is exactly the checking routine the examination allows for.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Portuguese (9PG0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)
References & sources