EuraStudy
Notes/Persian/Paper 1 Section B: reading (بخش ب: درک مطلب)
Notes · PersianUK · A-Levels

Paper 1 Section B: reading (بخش ب: درک مطلب)

This topic carries Paper 1 Section B, the reading assessment: 20 marks, a recommended 45 minutes, four questions of mixed multiple-choice and open-response, on a variety of text types and genres drawn from across all the sub-themes of all four themes. Every question in Section B is set in Persian and must be answered in Persian, and no dictionary is permitted anywhere in the paper. Section B sits between the translation into English that opens Paper 1 and the forty-mark research question that closes it, and although it is the smallest of the three sections it carries a disproportionate share of the qualification's AO2 weighting: Paper 1 as a whole is 25 per cent AO2 out of a total of 30 per cent, so most of the reading marks in the entire A-Level are earned in this paper. This topic teaches the five question shapes that recur, the text types you should have read before the examination, the discipline of answering in your own Persian rather than copying, the difference between what a text says and what it implies, and how to work out an unknown word without a dictionary.

5 sections·~33 min reading time·4 competencies·Level Foundation 1 · Standard 2 · Advanced 2

T·0999 / 12
Exam profile
AO2 · Understand and respond in writing to written Persian from a variety of sources and genresAO3 · Manipulate Persian accurately when re-encoding information from a textAO4 · Recognise the cultural and social framing a Persian text carriesAO2 · Distinguish what a text states from what it implies, and evidence the difference
Operators:بخوانیدپاسخ دهیدتوضیح دهیدمقایسه کنیداستنباط کنیدخلاصه کنیدانتخاب کنیدنشان دهید

basic level

At first-year standard the expectation is accurate retrieval and a correct short answer in Persian: finding the right sentence, re-encoding it in a full clause, and answering the question type that was asked rather than a neighbouring one.

higher level

The full A-Level expects the reading to go beyond retrieval: recognising the writer's stance from the words that carry it, distinguishing a claim from a hedge and a fact from an attribution, comparing two positions within one text, and evidencing an inference by pointing to the words that support it — all expressed in accurate Persian of the same standard the written papers demand.

Depth

Reading depth: In depth

Text

Text size: Standard

Contents · 5 sections▾
  1. Paper 1 Section B: reading (بخش ب: درک مطلب)
    • 01What Section B asks, and the five shapes it asks it in○
    • 02The text types and genres you should have read already◐
    • 03Answering in Persian without copying the text◐
    • 04Inference, tone and purpose: what the text does not say●
    • 05Working out a word without a dictionary●
§ 01

What Section B asks, and the five shapes it asks it in#

●○○FoundationLPPearson Edexcel 9PN0 Paper 1 Section B (reading, 20 marks, recommended 45 minutes, four questions)

Five question shapes, five traps, five fixes

The five reading question shapesTable with 4 columns and 5 rows, Data: Question shape · What it wants · The characteristic trap · The fix; Multiple choice · One discriminating detail · The option echoing a word · Find what separates the options; Retrieval · A stated fact, located · Copying the whole sentence · Re-encode in your own Persian; Inference · What the text supports · Answering from outside it · Point to the words that imply it; Writer's stance · Tone, position, purpose · Confusing topic with stance · Name the word that carries it; Summary · Structure across the text · A list of remembered facts · Build the answer on connectivesQUESTION SHAPEWHAT IT WANTSTHE CHARACTERISTICTRAPTHE FIXMultiple choiceOne discriminating detailThe option echoing a wordFind what separates theoptionsRetrievalA stated fact, locatedCopying the whole sentenceRe-encode in your ownPersianInferenceWhat the text supportsAnswering from outside itPoint to the words thatimply itWriter's stanceTone, position, purposeConfusing topic with stanceName the word that carriesitSummaryStructure across the textA list of remembered factsBuild the answer onconnectives
Fig. 1Almost every reading question in this qualification is one of these five, and each has one characteristic way of going wrong. Read the third column before an examination and the fourth during one. The table is in English because the figure engine emits no direction attribute and has no bidi handling; the questions themselves are set in Persian and must be answered in Persian.

Key points

The specification's description of Section B is short and every clause in it matters. It is a reading assessment based on a variety of text types and genres; students respond to a series of comprehension questions; there are four questions; the questions are multiple choice and open response; the content draws on vocabulary and structures across all sub-themes from within the four themes; the recommended time is 45 minutes for 20 marks; and all questions in Sections B and C are set in Persian and must be answered in Persian. Two of those clauses are the ones candidates forget: across all sub-themes, meaning nothing in the specification is out of scope here, and answered in Persian, meaning this is a writing task as well as a reading one.
Forty-five minutes for twenty marks is generous relative to the other sections, and the generosity is deliberate: this is a section where reading carefully pays. The best use of the time is a three-stage pass. First read the whole text once without answering anything, to establish what kind of text it is and what position, if any, it takes. Then read the questions. Then work through the text again with the questions in mind, answering as you go. Candidates who read the questions first and then hunt for keywords tend to answer the retrieval questions well and the inference questions badly, because a keyword hunt never builds a sense of the whole.
Five question shapes recur across this family of papers and each rewards something different. Multiple choice tests discrimination between close alternatives. Retrieval asks for a fact that is stated. Inference asks for something the text supports but does not state. A question about tone or purpose asks what stance the writer takes and how you know. And a summary or synthesis question asks you to bring together material from more than one part of the text. Knowing which shape you are answering determines what a good answer looks like, and answering one shape in the manner of another is the commonest way to lose marks in this section.
One rule governs all five: everything you write must be defensible from the text. Section B assesses AO2, understanding of and response to written language, and it is not asking what you know about the topic. If you have researched Iranian cinema and the text is about a film, your research earns nothing here — it earns its marks in Section C, forty minutes later in the same paper. The discipline of answering from the text alone is not a limitation to work around; it is the skill being tested, and candidates who import outside knowledge tend to import it instead of reading closely.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section B: four questions of four different shapes on one short text

متن: «شهرداری اعلام کرده است که از ماه آینده ورود خودروها به بافت قدیم محدود می‌شود. برخی از کسبه از این تصمیم استقبال کرده‌اند و می‌گویند که پیاده‌روی، مشتری بیشتری می‌آورد. دیگران نگران‌اند که مشتریان قدیمی، که از محله‌های دور می‌آیند، دیگر نیایند. شهرداری وعده داده است که پس از سه ماه نتیجه را بررسی کند.» پرسش الف (بازیابی): شهرداری چه اعلام کرده است؟ پرسش ب (چندگزینه‌ای): کدام گزینه درست است؟ پرسش ج (استنباط): چرا برخی کسبه نگران‌اند؟ پرسش د (موضع نویسنده): آیا نویسنده موضعی گرفته است؟

  1. 01(a) Retrieval: locate, then re-encode

    The fact is in the first sentence. Do not write it back verbatim. شهرداری اعلام کرده است که از ماه آینده ورود خودروها به بافت قدیم محدود خواهد شد — note the shift of محدود می‌شود to محدود خواهد شد, which is a legitimate re-encoding since the text's present has future reference, and which demonstrates your own Persian. Keep the attribution شهرداری, because the question asked what the municipality announced, not what will happen.

  2. 02(b) Multiple choice: the options are built from the text's own words

    Suppose the options are: (الف) همه‌ی کسبه مخالف‌اند; (ب) برخی کسبه موافق و برخی نگران‌اند; (ج) شهرداری تصمیم را پس گرفته است. Option one fails on the quantifier همه, since the text says برخی and دیگران. Option three fails outright: the text says وعده داده است که نتیجه را بررسی کند, promised to review the outcome, which is not a withdrawal. Option two matches. The pattern is the usual one — a wrong quantifier and an invented action, both dressed in the text's vocabulary.

  3. 03(c) Inference: the reason is implied, so point at the words that imply it

    The text does not say why they are worried in so many words; it gives a relative clause that does the work: مشتریان قدیمی، که از محله‌های دور می‌آیند. The inference is that customers who come from distant districts arrive by car, and that a restriction on cars will therefore keep them away. Write it with its evidence: برخی کسبه نگران‌اند زیرا مشتریان قدیمی آنان از محله‌های دور می‌آیند و احتمالاً با خودرو، و محدودیت ورود خودرو می‌تواند آنان را از آمدن بازدارد. The word احتمالاً, probably, is important: it marks the inferential step as inferential, which is exactly what a good inference answer does.

  4. 04(d) Stance: notice what the writer does not do

    نویسنده موضعی نگرفته است. او هر دو دیدگاه را با فعل‌های خنثی گزارش می‌کند — استقبال کرده‌اند و نگران‌اند — و در پایان تنها وعده‌ی شهرداری را نقل می‌کند بی‌آنکه درباره‌ی آن داوری کند. The writer has taken no position: both views are reported with neutral verbs and the closing sentence merely quotes the municipality's promise without judging it. Answering a stance question with a claim about the topic is the standard failure; answering it by naming the verbs and the absence of evaluative adjectives is what shows you have read the text rather than skimmed it.

Result: الف: شهرداری اعلام کرده است که از ماه آینده ورود خودروها به بافت قدیم محدود خواهد شد. ب: گزینه‌ی دوم. ج: برخی کسبه نگران‌اند زیرا مشتریان قدیمی آنان از محله‌های دور می‌آیند و احتمالاً با خودرو، و محدودیت ورود خودرو می‌تواند آنان را از آمدن بازدارد. د: نویسنده موضعی نگرفته است؛ او هر دو دیدگاه را با فعل‌های خنثی گزارش می‌کند و در پایان تنها وعده‌ی شهرداری را نقل می‌کند بی‌آنکه درباره‌ی آن داوری کند.

Exam focus

  • Read the whole text once before you read the questions. The inference questions depend on a sense of the whole.
  • Identify which of the five shapes each question is, and answer in that shape.
  • Answer from the text alone. Outside knowledge earns nothing in Section B and often replaces close reading.

Typical mistakes

  • Hunting for keywords without reading the text. It works for retrieval and fails for everything else.
  • Answering in English. Sections B and C are set in Persian and answered in Persian.
  • Bringing in researched material. Save it for Section C, where the AO4 grid pays for it.
  • Rushing Section B to protect Section C time. The recommended 45 minutes is there because careful reading earns marks.

Active revision

یک متن فارسی هشتصد کلمه‌ای بردارید و برای آن پنج پرسش از پنج نوع متفاوت بسازید؛ سپس پاسخ نمونه بنویسید و زیر هر پاسخ مشخص کنید که کدام واژه‌ی متن آن را پشتیبانی می‌کند

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Persian (9PN0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 02

The text types and genres you should have read already#

●●○StandardLPPearson Edexcel 9PN0 Paper 1 Section B: a variety of text types and genres, across all sub-themes

Key points

The specification promises a variety of text types and genres, and preparation for this section is largely a matter of not being surprised by a form. The forms most likely to appear are: the news report, خبر, with its inverted structure and its attributions; the feature or magazine article, مقاله, with an argument; the interview, مصاحبه, laid out as question and answer; the opinion piece or editorial, سرمقاله, which takes a position openly; the review, نقد, of a book, a film or an exhibition; the personal account or memoir extract, خاطره; the informative or official text, اطلاعیه; and prose fiction, داستان. Each has conventions that tell you in advance where the important material sits.
Knowing the conventions is worth real marks because it tells you where to look. In a news report the core facts are at the top and the attributions run all the way through, so a retrieval question will usually be answerable from the first two sentences and a stance question is usually answered by there being no stance. In an editorial the position is stated early and defended after, so the argument's structure is the answer to a summary question. In an interview the interviewer's questions frame the material, and a stance question is nearly always about the interviewee. In a review, evaluation and description alternate, and separating them is the whole reading task.
Register varies with genre and so does vocabulary, which is why reading widely matters more than reading a lot. An official notice will use formal alternatives such as گردیدن and نمودن, nominalisations and long ezafe chains. A magazine feature will use ordinary formal prose. A memoir may reproduce speech and drop into the colloquial forms taught in the grammar topic. Fiction may do anything at all. A reading diet consisting only of news reports leaves you fluent in one register and slow in four, which in a forty-five-minute section is a real cost. The practical remedy is to keep a short list of register markers rather than a long vocabulary list. Three or four formal verbs, two or three colloquial contractions, the nominalising endings, and the handful of connectives each register prefers will let you place an unfamiliar text within a sentence or two of starting it — and knowing what kind of prose you are in tells you how literally to read it, which is the difference between a confident answer and a cautious one.
One practical preparation plan. Read one Persian text a day from a different genre in rotation, and after each one write three sentences in Persian: what the text is about, what position it takes if any, and one thing it implies without saying. That last sentence is the inference practice, which is the hardest thing to acquire and the thing most candidates never practise deliberately. Do this from both Iranian and Afghan sources where you can, since the specification's material is culturally relevant to both, and keep a running list of unfamiliar words grouped by root rather than alphabetically.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section B: reading a review, where description and evaluation alternate

متن: «نمایشگاه تازه‌ی این گالری سی اثر از چهار هنرمند جوان را گرد آورده است. چیدمان آثار روشن و بی‌ادعاست و بیننده به‌آسانی از یک اتاق به اتاق دیگر می‌رود. با این حال، متن‌های همراه بسیار کوتاه‌اند و بیننده‌ای که با این هنرمندان آشنا نیست، چیز زیادی درباره‌ی آنان نمی‌آموزد.» پرسش: نویسنده درباره‌ی این نمایشگاه چه می‌گوید؟ توصیف و ارزیابی را از هم جدا کنید.

  1. 01Sort the sentences before you write

    Sentence one is pure description: what is there and how much. Sentence two mixes description with evaluation: چیدمان روشن و بی‌ادعاست is an assessment, while بیننده به‌آسانی می‌رود is a consequence of it. Sentence three is evaluation with a reason attached. So the passage runs description, evaluation, counter-evaluation — which is the standard shape of a review and is what the question is really asking you to see.

  2. 02Write the description without importing the judgement

    نویسنده می‌گوید که نمایشگاه سی اثر از چهار هنرمند جوان را در بر دارد. در بر داشتن, to contain or comprise, is a good neutral verb here and re-encodes گرد آوردن. Nothing evaluative belongs in this sentence: the number of works and the number of artists are facts and should be reported as facts, which is precisely the discipline the question is testing by asking you to separate the two.

  3. 03Write the positive evaluation and attach its evidence

    او چیدمان را می‌ستاید و آن را روشن و بی‌ادعا می‌خواند؛ شاهد او این است که بیننده به‌آسانی میان اتاق‌ها حرکت می‌کند. ستودن, to praise, is a literary verb and a register lift over تعریف کردن. چیزی را چیزی خواندن, to call something something, is the same two-complement pattern you have met before. Attaching the evidence — شاهد او این است که — is what makes this an analysis of the review rather than a repetition of it.

  4. 04Write the reservation with its condition intact

    اما او متن‌های همراه را کوتاه می‌داند و می‌گوید که بیننده‌ی ناآشنا از آن‌ها چیز زیادی نمی‌آموزد. Note بیننده‌ی ناآشنا, the unfamiliar viewer: the reviewer's criticism is conditional on the visitor not already knowing the artists, and a summary that reports it as a flat criticism has overstated it. That conditional is carried in the original by the relative clause که با این هنرمندان آشنا نیست, and noticing relative clauses is one of the most reliable routes to precision in this section.

Result: توصیف: نویسنده می‌گوید که نمایشگاه سی اثر از چهار هنرمند جوان را در بر دارد. ارزیابی: او چیدمان را می‌ستاید و آن را روشن و بی‌ادعا می‌خواند؛ شاهد او این است که بیننده به‌آسانی میان اتاق‌ها حرکت می‌کند. اما او متن‌های همراه را کوتاه می‌داند و می‌گوید که بیننده‌ی ناآشنا از آن‌ها چیز زیادی نمی‌آموزد.

Exam focus

  • Learn where each genre keeps its important material. It tells you where to look before you have read a word.
  • Read across genres, not volume. Five genres once each beats one genre five times.
  • Practise inference deliberately: one sentence a day about what a text implies but does not say.

Typical mistakes

  • Expecting every text to take a position. A news report usually takes none, and saying so is the right answer.
  • Reading only journalism. The specification promises a variety, and fiction and memoir read very differently.
  • Treating an interview's questions as the writer's opinions. They are prompts, and the stance being asked about is usually the interviewee's.
  • Skipping the register differences. An official text and a memoir may be equally difficult for opposite reasons.

Active revision

هشت گونه‌ی متنی را نام ببرید و برای هر کدام در یک جمله بنویسید که اطلاعات اصلی معمولاً در کجای آن قرار دارد؛ سپس یک نمونه‌ی فارسی از هر گونه پیدا کنید

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: GCE AS and A level subject content for modern foreign languages (Department for Education)

§ 03

Answering in Persian without copying the text#

●●○StandardLPPearson Edexcel 9PN0 Paper 1 Section B: all questions set in Persian and answered in Persian

Key points

Because Section B is answered in Persian, every answer is simultaneously a comprehension response and a piece of writing, and the two can be at odds. The temptation under time pressure is to lift the relevant sentence from the text and drop it into the answer space, which feels safe and is rarely optimal. Three problems follow. The lifted sentence may not contain the element the question asks for, since it was not written as an answer. It may contain far more than the question asks, wasting time. And it demonstrates nothing about your own command of Persian, which the examiner is also reading.
The alternative is re-encoding, and it is a specific skill worth drilling. Re-encoding means expressing the same content with different lexical choices and a different structure: swap a verb for a near-synonym, turn an active into a passive or the reverse, nominalise a clause or unpack a nominalisation, change the order of a chain. کاهش یافته است for کمتر شده است; در بر دارد for گرد آورده است; محدود خواهد شد for محدود می‌شود. Practise it explicitly by taking a Persian sentence and rewriting it three ways without changing its meaning; twenty minutes of that a week transforms the fluency of your answers.
Answer length is a real decision and the rule is: complete, then stop. A full clause with a subject and a verb, containing exactly the element asked for, is the target. Bare nouns risk being judged incomplete; whole paragraphs risk burying the required element and cost time you need. Where a question asks for two things — a reason and an example, two views, a comparison — give both explicitly and mark them, with connectives or with a simple نخست and دوم, so that the examiner can see both without hunting. The same rule applies to the multiple-choice items, where the answer is a letter and nothing else is asked for: adding a justification nobody requested costs seconds you will want later, and cannot add marks. And when you genuinely cannot decide between two options, choose and move on rather than leaving the item blank — an unanswered question scores nothing with certainty, whereas a considered choice between two plausible options scores half the time. Section B is short enough that a single item left unresolved at the end is a real proportion of twenty marks.
One last discipline that is specific to answering in the target language. Do not attempt a structure you are not sure of just because the text used it. If the text has a complex passive perfect inside a relative clause, you do not need to reproduce it; you need to convey what it said, in Persian you control. Accuracy is being assessed alongside comprehension throughout this paper, and a simpler sentence that is right is worth more than an ambitious one that collapses. The place to display range deliberately is Section C, where a whole grid is devoted to it.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section B: the same question answered by copying and by re-encoding

متن: «کتابخانه‌ی مرکزی، که در سال‌های اخیر ساعت‌های کاری خود را افزایش داده است، اکنون تا نیمه‌شب باز است و این تغییر به‌ویژه برای دانشجویانی سودمند بوده که در روز کار می‌کنند.» پرسش: این تغییر برای چه کسانی سودمند بوده است و چرا؟

  1. 01The copied answer, and why it is weaker than it looks

    A copying answer writes: این تغییر به‌ویژه برای دانشجویانی سودمند بوده که در روز کار می‌کنند. It contains the required information and it may well score. But look at what it does not do: it does not answer the چرا half explicitly, since the reason is only implied by the relative clause; and it shows no Persian of the candidate's own. On a question worth two marks with a reason component, that is a real risk for no gain.

  2. 02The re-encoded answer, built as two marked parts

    این تغییر بیش از همه به سود دانشجویانی بوده است که روزها مشغول کارند. علت آن روشن است: چنین دانشجویانی تنها پس از پایان کار می‌توانند به کتابخانه بروند، و ساعت‌های تازه این امکان را فراهم کرده است. Two parts, marked by علت آن روشن است. به سود کسی بودن replaces سودمند بودن برای; مشغول کار بودن replaces کار کردن; فراهم کردن introduces a verb the text did not use. Every content element is present and none of it is copied.

  3. 03Notice the inferential step and mark it

    The text does not literally say that such students can only go after work; it says the change has been beneficial for them. The re-encoded answer supplies the mechanism, which is an inference — a safe one, but an inference. Marking it as a reason with علت آن is the honest way to include it, and inference questions in this section reward exactly this: an implied step, stated as implied, with the words that support it visible in the answer.

  4. 04Check the grammar of the relative clause before moving on

    دانشجویانی که روزها مشغول کارند has an indefinite plural head with a restrictive relative clause. The indefinite ی on دانشجویان is required by the restrictive reading — those students who work, not the students, who work — and Persian marks that distinction with the ی exactly as English marks it with the absence of a comma. Getting it right is a small point of accuracy that separates a fluent answer from a merely correct one, and this section rewards it.

Result: این تغییر بیش از همه به سود دانشجویانی بوده است که روزها مشغول کارند. علت آن روشن است: چنین دانشجویانی تنها پس از پایان کار می‌توانند به کتابخانه بروند، و ساعت‌های تازه‌ی کتابخانه این امکان را فراهم کرده است.

Exam focus

  • Re-encode rather than copy. It protects the mark and shows your Persian at the same time.
  • A full clause containing exactly the required element, then stop.
  • Where two things are asked for, mark them as two. Do not make the examiner find the second one.

Typical mistakes

  • Copying a long sentence that contains the answer somewhere inside it.
  • Answering with a bare noun. It may be judged incomplete.
  • Writing a paragraph for a two-mark question and running short of time for the research question.
  • Reproducing a structure you cannot control because the text used it.

Active revision

ده جمله‌ی فارسی را برگزینید و هر کدام را سه بار بازنویسی کنید بی‌آنکه معنایش تغییر کند؛ در هر بازنویسی دست‌کم یک فعل و یک ساختار را عوض کنید

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Persian (9PN0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 04

Inference, tone and purpose: what the text does not say#

●●●AdvancedLPPearson Edexcel 9PN0 Paper 1 Section B (open-response comprehension questions)

Key points

An inference question asks for something the text supports but does not state, and the whole difficulty is the boundary: too cautious and you have merely repeated the text, too bold and you have imported your own opinion. The reliable technique is to make the inference and immediately show the words that license it. In Persian this is a single construction: the inference, then زیرا متن می‌گوید که and the words from the text that license it. Building the evidence into the sentence forces you to check that the evidence exists, which is exactly the check that separates a supported inference from a guess.
Tone and stance are carried by identifiable words, and learning which words carry them makes these questions tractable. Evaluative adjectives — سودمند, نگران‌کننده, امیدوارکننده, ناکافی — carry stance openly. Verbs of attribution carry stance covertly: می‌گوید is neutral, ادعا می‌کند implies scepticism, تأکید می‌کند implies endorsement, هشدار می‌دهد implies alarm, می‌پذیرد implies concession. Modal and hedging expressions — شاید, ممکن است, به نظر می‌رسد, ظاهراً, بی‌گمان — position the writer relative to the claim. And connectives carry it too: با این حال and در حالی که introduce reservations, while بنابراین endorses a conclusion. Two further signals are easy to miss and are worth listening for. The order in which positions are presented matters: a writer who gives the opposing view first and their own second has arranged the paragraph to end on their own, and arrangement is a choice. And so does what is left unattributed: a claim reported with a named source and a claim asserted flatly in the same paragraph are being treated differently by the writer, whether or not they say so.
Purpose questions ask what the text is for, and the answer is usually one of a small set: to inform, to persuade, to explain, to review and evaluate, to record an experience, or to give notice of something. The genre is a strong clue but not a decisive one, since a news report can be written to persuade. The decisive evidence is the same evidence as for tone: the density of evaluative words, the presence or absence of attribution, whether counter-positions are presented and whether they are answered. A text that presents two views and answers neither is informing; one that presents two and answers one is persuading.
Two failure modes are worth naming because both are common in able candidates. The first is answering with what you would think rather than what the text implies; the guard is the زیرا clause, which will not attach if the evidence is not there. The second is over-reading a single word — treating one evaluative adjective as proof of a sustained position when the rest of the text is neutral. The guard against that is to look for a second instance before you commit: a stance that appears once may be a slip, while a stance that appears three times is the text's.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section B: an inference question and a stance question on the same short text

متن: «مسئولان ادعا می‌کنند که خط تازه‌ی اتوبوس زمان سفر را نصف کرده است. با این حال، در ساعت‌های شلوغ هنوز صف‌های بلندی در ایستگاه‌ها دیده می‌شود، و هیچ آمار مستقلی درباره‌ی این ادعا منتشر نشده است.» پرسش الف: از این متن چه چیزی می‌توان استنباط کرد که در آن گفته نشده است؟ پرسش ب: نویسنده چه موضعی دارد و از کجا می‌دانید؟

  1. 01(a) Find what is implied and locate its licence

    The text does not say the officials' claim is false. It implies that it is unverified and possibly overstated. Write the inference with its evidence attached: می‌توان استنباط کرد که ادعای مسئولان هنوز آزموده نشده است، زیرا متن می‌گوید هیچ آمار مستقلی منتشر نشده و در ساعت‌های شلوغ صف‌های بلندی دیده می‌شود. آزموده نشدن, not having been tested, is the precise word: it claims exactly what the evidence supports and no more, which is the whole skill.

  2. 02Notice what the inference must not say

    It must not say that the officials are lying, and it must not say that travel time has not halved. Neither is supported: an absence of independent figures is not evidence of falsity, and long queues at peak times are compatible with a halved average journey. Writing the stronger claim would be the classic over-reading failure, and it would be visible to an examiner as an unsupported step. The discipline of claiming exactly what the evidence licenses is the same discipline the research question rewards forty minutes later.

  3. 03(b) Identify the stance markers, of which there are three

    First, ادعا می‌کنند rather than می‌گویند: the verb of attribution carries scepticism. Second, با این حال: a concessive that introduces material against the claim. Third, هیچ آمار مستقلی منتشر نشده است: the writer has chosen to mention an absence of evidence, which is a choice, not a fact of nature. Three markers is a pattern, not a slip, so the stance claim is safe.

  4. 04Write the stance answer as claim plus three pieces of evidence

    نویسنده نسبت به ادعای مسئولان بدگمان است. سه نشانه این را آشکار می‌کند: نخست، فعل «ادعا کردن» را به جای «گفتن» به کار می‌برد؛ دوم، با «با این حال» شاهدی در برابر ادعا می‌آورد؛ سوم، به نبود آمار مستقل اشاره می‌کند. The writer is sceptical of the officials' claim, and three signs make this clear. Enumerating نخست, دوم, سوم makes the three pieces of evidence individually visible, which is worth doing whenever a question asks از کجا می‌دانید — how you know is the part being marked.

Result: الف: می‌توان استنباط کرد که ادعای مسئولان هنوز آزموده نشده است، زیرا متن می‌گوید هیچ آمار مستقلی منتشر نشده و در ساعت‌های شلوغ صف‌های بلندی دیده می‌شود. ب: نویسنده نسبت به ادعای مسئولان بدگمان است؛ سه نشانه این را آشکار می‌کند: نخست، فعل «ادعا کردن» را به جای «گفتن» به کار می‌برد؛ دوم، با «با این حال» شاهدی در برابر ادعا می‌آورد؛ سوم، به نبود آمار مستقل اشاره می‌کند.

Exam focus

  • State the inference and attach its evidence in the same sentence with زیرا. If the clause will not attach, the inference is unsupported.
  • Learn the verbs of attribution as a stance ladder: می‌گوید, ادعا می‌کند, تأکید می‌کند, هشدار می‌دهد, می‌پذیرد.
  • Before claiming a stance, find a second instance. One evaluative word is not a position.

Typical mistakes

  • Answering an inference question with your own opinion about the topic.
  • Treating ادعا می‌کند as a neutral synonym for می‌گوید. It carries scepticism and question-setters know it.
  • Confusing what a text is about with what it is for. Purpose is a separate question.
  • Building a stance claim on one adjective in an otherwise neutral text.

Active revision

پنج فعل نقل قول را از خنثی‌ترین تا جهت‌دارترین مرتب کنید و برای هر کدام یک جمله بنویسید؛ سپس متنی کوتاه بیابید و بگویید نویسنده کدام‌ها را به کار برده و این انتخاب چه چیزی را نشان می‌دهد

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Persian (9PN0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 05

Working out a word without a dictionary#

●●●AdvancedLPPearson Edexcel 9PN0: no dictionary is permitted in any paperLPPearson Edexcel 9PN0 Appendix 2 — noun formation with prefixes and suffixes; compound nouns

Key points

No dictionary is allowed in any paper of this qualification, so every unknown word must be handled by inference, and Persian gives you unusually good tools for it. The first is the Arabic root pattern, which governs a large part of the formal vocabulary. Arabic-derived words are built by fitting a three-consonant root into a template, so once you know the templates you can often recover a meaning: from the root that gives کتاب, book, come کاتب writer, مکتوب written, مکتب school, and کتابت the act of writing. From the root that gives علم, knowledge, come عالم learned, معلوم known, تعلیم instruction, and معلم teacher. You do not need to study Arabic; you need to notice the families.
The second tool is Persian's own derivational apparatus, which is regular and productive. Agent and instrument suffixes: کارگر worker, آهنگر smith, باغبان gardener, دربان doorkeeper. Place suffixes: گلستان, دانشگاه, آموزشگاه, کتابخانه. Quality suffixes: هنرمند talented or artistic, خطرناک dangerous, دوستانه friendly, بزرگی greatness. Negative and privative prefixes: بی‌کار unemployed, ناتوان unable, نادرست incorrect. And intensifiers: پرکار hard-working, کم‌آب short of water. A word you have never seen is often a familiar stem plus one of these, and identifying the stem is usually enough. Two further families repay learning because they are everywhere in formal prose: the verbal-noun endings ش and اری, which turn a stem into an abstract noun — روش method from رفتن, پرسش question, نگهداری maintenance, خبرنگاری journalism — and the participial adjectives in نده and شده, which turn a verb into a describer: کننده doing, دهنده giving, نویسنده writer, گفته‌شده said. Once you can see those endings, a great many long and forbidding words resolve into a stem you already know plus a job description, and the sentence around them becomes readable at speed.
The third tool is the compound verb, which is where most of the modern verbal vocabulary lives. If you meet an unfamiliar verb, check whether it is a noun you know plus a light verb you know: تأثیر گذاشتن, دست یافتن, به کار بردن, از دست دادن, به پایان رساندن. The nominal part carries the lexical meaning and the light verb carries the grammar, so a known noun plus an unknown-looking construction is usually recoverable. And when you meet a preposition attached to a verb, note it: verbal prepositions are listed in Appendix 2 as examinable content precisely because they are fixed and unpredictable.
Finally, use the sentence. Persian word order puts the verb last and marks the object with را, so even a sentence full of unknown nouns has a recoverable skeleton: this did that to the other. Ask what part of speech the unknown word must be, given where it sits; ask whether it is coordinated with a word you know, since و often joins near-synonyms; ask whether the following clause explains it, since Persian often glosses a difficult term with یعنی or a relative clause. And when you still cannot recover it, paraphrase around it rather than leaving a gap: in Section A a gap scores nothing, while an approximate rendering of the segment may score.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section A: translating a sentence with two unknown words, without a dictionary

Translate into English. «شهرداری برای بهسازی گذرگاه‌های پیاده در محله‌های پرتراکم بودجه‌ای تخصیص داده است، هرچند کارشناسان این مبلغ را ناکافی می‌دانند.» Suppose you do not know بهسازی or پرتراکم.

  1. 01Recover بهسازی from its parts

    The word divides as به plus ساز plus ی. به is the adjective good or well; ساز is the present stem of ساختن, to make or build; and the ی suffix makes an abstract noun. So the word is the act of making good — improvement, upgrading, refurbishment. Combined with گذرگاه‌های پیاده, pedestrian crossings or walkways, the meaning is secure: the improvement of pedestrian crossings. Notice that no dictionary was involved and the reasoning took five seconds once the parts were seen.

  2. 02Recover پرتراکم the same way

    پر is the intensifying prefix meaning full of or high in, as in پرکار hard-working. تراکم is an Arabic-derived noun for density or concentration, from a root meaning to pile up. So پرتراکم is densely populated or high-density, and محله‌های پرتراکم is densely populated neighbourhoods. If تراکم itself were unknown, the prefix پر plus the plural محله‌ها would still tell you it is a property neighbourhoods can have in a high degree, which is enough for a translation that scores.

  3. 03Assemble the main clause with its correct tense

    شهرداری ... بودجه‌ای تخصیص داده است is The municipality has allocated a budget. تخصیص دادن, to allocate, is a compound verb; the present perfect داده است is correct in English as has allocated. بودجه‌ای carries the indefinite ی — a budget, an amount — and takes no را because it is non-specific, which is itself a clue that the sum is being introduced rather than referred back to.

  4. 04Translate the concessive, and keep the verb of judgement

    هرچند کارشناسان این مبلغ را ناکافی می‌دانند is although experts consider this sum insufficient. این مبلغ را is now specific — this sum, the one just mentioned — hence را, and the contrast with بودجه‌ای in the previous clause is a small masterclass in how را tracks specificity across a sentence boundary. ناکافی is نا plus کافی, another privative prefix. And می‌دانند is consider, not know: the چیزی را چیزی دانستن pattern again, which is one of the highest-frequency constructions in this whole qualification.

Result: The municipality has allocated a budget for the improvement of pedestrian walkways in densely populated neighbourhoods, although experts consider this sum insufficient.

Exam focus

  • Learn the common Arabic-derived families as families. Recovering one member from another is the highest-yield vocabulary skill in this qualification.
  • Learn the Persian suffixes and prefixes as a productive set. Most unfamiliar words are a familiar stem plus one of them.
  • Never leave a gap in a translation. Paraphrase around the word; a gap can score nothing at all.

Typical mistakes

  • Stopping at an unknown word and reading no further. The rest of the sentence usually contains the clue.
  • Assuming an Arabic-looking word is untranslatable. It is usually one member of a family you already know.
  • Ignoring the preposition attached to a verb. It is fixed, examinable and often changes the meaning.
  • Guessing wildly rather than paraphrasing. A controlled approximation is defensible; an invented meaning is not.

Active revision

پنج ریشه‌ی عربی پرکاربرد را بردارید و برای هر کدام چهار واژه‌ی فارسی بسازید؛ سپس ده واژه با پسوندهای فارسی بنویسید و در کنار هر کدام معنای پسوند را توضیح دهید

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Persian (9PN0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

Contents

Section -- / 05

    • 01What Section B asks, and the five shapes it asks it in○
    • 02The text types and genres you should have read already◐
    • 03Answering in Persian without copying the text◐
    • 04Inference, tone and purpose: what the text does not say●
    • 05Working out a word without a dictionary●

0/5 Read

From notes into training

Paper 1 Section B: reading (بخش ب: درک مطلب)

Reinforce this topic with matching tasks from the question bank.

~33
min
4
Competencies
Practise

References & sources

Sources

Pearson Edexcel

  • Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Persian (9PN0) specification

Department for Education

  • GCE AS and A level subject content for modern foreign languages

Previous topic

Paper 3: listening, reading and writing (برگه‌ی سوم)

Next topic

Paper 2 Section B: the literary text (پاسخ به آثار ادبی)

EuraStudy·Notes T·09·MMXXVI

Carry on to the next topic — your learning path is kept.