EuraStudy
Notes/Gujarati/વ્યાકરણ અને અનુવાદ: the grammar list and the two translation tasks
Notes · GujaratiUK · A-Levels

વ્યાકરણ અને અનુવાદ: the grammar list and the two translation tasks

This topic covers Appendix 2 of Pearson Edexcel 9GU0, the prescribed grammar list, together with the two translation tasks it is examined through: Paper 1 Section A, translation of an unseen Gujarati text into English for 20 marks in a recommended 20 minutes, and Paper 2 Section A, translation of an unseen English passage into Gujarati for 20 marks in a recommended 30 minutes. Both are marked by a points-based scheme in which one mark is given for each correct individual section of language, so they reward completeness and precision rather than elegance. The content of both is drawn from any one of the eight sub-themes. Grammar is not confined to these 40 marks, however: AO3, manipulate the language accurately in written forms using a range of lexis and structure, is 30 per cent of the whole qualification, and an AO3 grid is applied to every extended answer in every paper.

5 sections·~32 min reading time·4 competencies·Level Foundation 1 · Standard 2 · Advanced 2

T·0777 / 12
Exam profile
AO3 · Manipulate Gujarati accurately in written form, using a range of lexis and structure, across the postposition system, three-gender agreement, the ergative perfective and the honorific registersAO2 · Understand written Gujarati precisely enough to render it into English without omission or additionAO4 · Recognise the cultural specificity of vocabulary that has no direct English equivalent, and translate the relationship rather than the wordAO1 · Carry the same grammatical control into writing produced from spoken sources in Paper 3
Operators:અનુવાદ કરોભાષાંતર કરોસુધારોઓળખોસમજાવોલખોરૂપાંતર કરો

basic level

In the first year, secure four things before anything else: the gender of every noun you learn, the oblique in -ા, the primary case markers ને, થી and માં, and the present and simple past of twenty common verbs. Translate two or three sentences into Gujarati every day rather than a paragraph once a week — the points-based scheme rewards the accumulation of small correct decisions.

higher level

The full A-Level expects complex language, and the specification's own list names it: the pluperfect and future perfect, the passive, the subjunctive, subordination, and extended sentences carrying abstract argument. Build each of those deliberately into your writing rather than hoping one appears. And drill the ergative until it is automatic, because it is the single structure that most reliably separates a candidate who has learned Gujarati from one who has learned to recognise it.

Depth

Reading depth: In depth

Text

Text size: Standard

Contents · 5 sections▾
  1. વ્યાકરણ અને અનુવાદ: the grammar list and the two translation tasks
    • 01What the two translation tasks actually mark○
    • 02Nouns, the oblique and the postposition system◐
    • 03Gender, number and agreement across three genders◐
    • 04The verb: tense, aspect, and the ergative perfective●
    • 05Register, honorifics and the errors the specification itself lists●
§ 01

What the two translation tasks actually mark#

●○○FoundationLPPearson Edexcel 9GU0 — Paper 1 Section A (translation into English)LPPearson Edexcel 9GU0 — Paper 2 Section A (translation into Gujarati)

Key points

The two translations are structurally identical and directionally opposite. Paper 1 Section A gives you an unseen Gujarati text to render into English: 20 marks, a recommended 20 minutes, and the only English you write in the entire qualification. Paper 2 Section A gives you an unseen English passage to render into Gujarati: 20 marks, a recommended 30 minutes — ten minutes more, because producing accurate Gujarati is slower than producing accurate English for a candidate at this level. The content of both is drawn from any one of the eight sub-themes, so the vocabulary you build for the thematic topics is the vocabulary these tasks test. Neither permits a dictionary.
The marking is the thing to internalise, because it is unlike the marking of everything else in the qualification. The specification says both translations are marked using a points-based mark scheme in which one mark is given for each correct individual section of language. There are no bands, no best fit, no reward for style. The text is divided into short stretches, each worth a mark, and you earn or lose each stretch independently. Two consequences follow and both are counter-intuitive. First, a clumsy but complete rendering outscores an elegant one that quietly drops a phrase. Second, a single word you cannot manage costs one mark, not the sentence — so guess sensibly and move on rather than freezing.
The method that follows from the marking is mechanical and should be practised until it is automatic. Read the whole passage once before writing anything, to establish tense, register and who is speaking. Translate sentence by sentence, but check chunk by chunk. When a sentence is done, run your eye back across the original in short stretches and confirm that each stretch has a counterpart in your version — including the small words that carry so much in Gujarati: હજી still, પણ also or but, જ the emphatic, ખરેખર really, છતાં nevertheless, માત્ર only. Those are the words candidates drop, and each is a mark.
The two directions fail in different ways and need different final checks. Into English, the commonest failures are dropping a small word, flattening an aspectual compound verb into a simple verb, and mistranslating a kinship or cultural term by finding an English word rather than the English phrase that carries the relationship. Into Gujarati, the commonest failures are omitting the ergative -એ on a perfective transitive, failing agreement between an adjective or participle and its noun, dropping the obligatory કે after a verb of saying, and word order — Gujarati is verb-final, and an English sentence must be dismantled rather than transposed.
Worked example

The chunk check, demonstrated on a short passage

Translate into English, then run the chunk check on your own version: ગામની શાળામાં હવે છોકરીઓની સંખ્યા છોકરાઓ જેટલી જ છે. વીસ વર્ષ પહેલાં એવું નહોતું. બદલાવ ધીમે ધીમે આવ્યો, પણ આવ્યો ખરો.

  1. 01A first, quick rendering

    In the village school the number of girls is now the same as boys. Twenty years ago it was not so. The change came slowly, but it came. That is a perfectly readable English paragraph and it would be marked well below its apparent quality, for reasons the chunk check exposes.

  2. 02Divide the original into markable stretches

    ગામની શાળામાં / હવે / છોકરીઓની સંખ્યા / છોકરાઓ જેટલી / જ / છે. // વીસ વર્ષ પહેલાં / એવું નહોતું. // બદલાવ / ધીમે ધીમે / આવ્યો, / પણ / આવ્યો / ખરો. Thirteen stretches. This is the granularity the points-based scheme works at, and dividing a practice passage this way is the single most useful revision exercise for Section A.

  3. 03Check each stretch against the rendering

    ગામની શાળામાં, in the village school — present. હવે, now — present. છોકરીઓની સંખ્યા, the number of girls — present. છોકરાઓ જેટલી, as much as the boys — present as the same as. જ, the emphatic — MISSING; the Gujarati says exactly as many, and the emphasis is a markable stretch. વીસ વર્ષ પહેલાં — present. એવું નહોતું — present. બદલાવ — present. ધીમે ધીમે — present. આવ્યો — present. પણ — present. આવ્યો, the repetition — collapsed into it came, which is acceptable. ખરો — MISSING; ખરો here is an affirmative particle meaning indeed or certainly, and it is the point of the sentence.

  4. 04Repair the two losses

    In the village school the number of girls is now exactly the same as that of the boys. Twenty years ago that was not so. The change came slowly, but it did come. Two words in English — exactly and did — restore two markable stretches. Neither improves the style; both earn marks. That is the whole lesson of Section A.

Result: In the village school the number of girls is now exactly the same as that of the boys. Twenty years ago that was not so. The change came slowly, but it did come. The chunk check found two lost marks in a paragraph that read perfectly well, which is exactly how Section A marks are usually lost.

Exam focus

  • One mark per correct section of language, in both directions. Completeness beats elegance, and a dropped phrase is a lost mark however good the rest is.
  • Twenty minutes for the English, thirty for the Gujarati. The extra ten minutes are recommended for a reason; do not overrun into Section B or the works essays.
  • Both translations are drawn from the sub-themes, so thematic vocabulary is translation vocabulary. Revise them together.
  • No dictionary in either paper. Build a habit of sensible approximation: an imperfect word costs one mark, a blank costs the same, and a blank also costs you time worrying about it.

Typical mistakes

  • Polishing the English while a clause is missing. The scheme cannot reward polish and cannot forgive omission.
  • Freezing on one unknown word. Write the best approximation, mark it lightly in your mind, and go on.
  • Transposing English word order into Gujarati. Gujarati puts the verb last and the postposition after its noun; a transposed sentence loses several marks at once.
  • Treating the two directions as one skill. They fail differently and need different final checks.

Active revision

એક ગુજરાતી ફકરો લો, તેનું અંગ્રેજીમાં ભાષાંતર કરો, પછી મૂળ ફકરાને નાના ટુકડામાં વહેંચીને તપાસો કે દરેક ટુકડાનો પ્રતિરૂપ તમારા અંગ્રેજીમાં છે કે નહીં. જે ટુકડા છૂટી ગયા હોય તેની યાદી બનાવો — એ જ તમારી ખરી ભૂલોની યાદી છે.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Gujarati (9GU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 02

Nouns, the oblique and the postposition system#

●●○StandardLPPearson Edexcel 9GU0 — Appendix 2: Grammar list — Nouns: case endings; Prepositions; Clause structures: postpositions

The postposition system: what attaches directly and what needs a genitive

Postpositions and their classesTable with 3 columns and 10 rows, Data: Form · Class · Example and gloss; -એ · Primary; ergative · ઘોડાએ લાત મારી — the horse kicked; -ને · Primary; dative or specific object · છોકરાને પથ્થર લાગ્યો — a stone struck the boy; -થી · Primary; instrumental or ablative · તળાવથી દૂર — far from the lake; -માં · Primary; locative · ઘરમાં — in the house; -નો -ની -નું · Primary; genitive, agrees · રામનું ઘર — Ram's house; માટે · Compound; needs a genitive · મારા માટે — for me; સાથે · Compound; needs a genitive · તેની સાથે — with him or her; પાસે · Compound; needs a genitive · શાળાની પાસે — near the school; પછી · Compound; follows a time phrase · વરસાદ પછી — after the rain; ને કારણે · Compound; needs the dative · વરસાદને કારણે — because of the rain, highlighted cell: -એFORMCLASSEXAMPLE AND GLOSS-એPrimary; ergativeઘોડાએ લાત મારી — the horsekicked-નેPrimary; dative or specificobjectછોકરાને પથ્થર લાગ્યો — astone struck the boy-થીPrimary; instrumental orablativeતળાવથી દૂર — far from thelake-માંPrimary; locativeઘરમાં — in the house-નો -ની -નુંPrimary; genitive, agreesરામનું ઘર — Ram's houseમાટેCompound; needs a genitiveમારા માટે — for meસાથેCompound; needs a genitiveતેની સાથે — with him or herપાસેCompound; needs a genitiveશાળાની પાસે — near theschoolપછીCompound; follows a timephraseવરસાદ પછી — after the rainને કારણેCompound; needs the dativeવરસાદને કારણે — because ofthe rain
Fig. 1The two classes of postposition, with an example of each in the oblique. Primary case markers attach straight onto the oblique noun; compound postpositions require a genitive in front of them, which is the single most common source of error when translating from English. The row in heavier ink is the ergative, which is not a postposition of place or direction at all but the marker that makes the whole perfective system work.

Key points

The specification's grammar list has a small inconsistency worth noticing, because it tells you something about the language. It heads one section Prepositions and says all prepositions, and elsewhere, under clause structures, it says postpositions. Gujarati has postpositions: the element that corresponds to an English preposition follows its noun rather than preceding it. ઘરમાં is in the house, from ઘર plus માં; ટેબલ પર is on the table. Reading an English sentence and looking for where the preposition goes is therefore the wrong instinct — the question is always which noun it attaches to, and it attaches behind.
Before a postposition a noun goes into the oblique, and the rule is short. A masculine noun ending in -ો changes that to -ા: છોકરો a boy becomes છોકરાને to the boy and છોકરાનું the boy's; ઘોડો a horse becomes ઘોડાએ, which is the specification's own example, ઘોડાએ લાત મારી, the horse kicked. A neuter noun in -ું behaves the same way. Feminine nouns in -ી and nouns ending in a consonant do not change: છોકરી a girl gives છોકરીને, and ઘર a house gives ઘરમાં — as in the specification's own તેનું ઘર તળાવથી થોડું દૂર છે, his house is a little way from the lake. Plurals add -ઓ where the plural form does not already carry it.
The postpositions themselves fall into two classes and the distinction saves a great deal of error. The primary case markers attach directly to the oblique noun with no linking element: -એ the ergative, -ને the dative and specific accusative, -થી the instrumental and ablative, -માં the locative, and -નો, -ની, -નું, -ના, -નાં the genitive. The compound postpositions, by contrast, follow a genitive form: મારા માટે for me, તેની સાથે with him, ઘરની પાસે near the house, ગામની વચ્ચે in the middle of the village, બે વર્ષ પહેલાં two years ago, વરસાદ પછી after the rain. Getting a genitive in front of માટે or સાથે is not decoration; without it the phrase is wrong.
The genitive deserves special attention because it agrees, and it agrees with the thing possessed rather than with the possessor — which is the reverse of the English instinct. રામનો ભાઈ, Ram's brother, takes -નો because ભાઈ is masculine singular; રામની બહેન takes -ની because બહેન is feminine; રામનું ઘર takes -નું because ઘર is neuter; રામનાં પુસ્તકો takes -નાં because પુસ્તકો is neuter plural. Once you have this, a whole class of errors disappears, including the one the specification itself lists among errors that do not hinder clarity but do cost marks.
Worked example

Paper 2 Section A: a sentence built out of postpositions, decided one at a time

Translate into Gujarati: Because of the rain, the teacher went with the children to a hall near the school instead of to the ground.

  1. 01Identify every English preposition and decide its class

    Because of — compound, needs the dative: વરસાદને કારણે. With — compound, needs a genitive: બાળકોની સાથે. To a hall — Gujarati often needs no marker on a destination, or takes -માં for entering: હોલમાં. Near the school — compound, needs a genitive: શાળાની પાસે. Instead of to the ground — compound, needs a genitive: મેદાનમાં જવાને બદલે. Five prepositions, five decisions, and each one is a mark.

  2. 02Order the phrase that modifies the hall

    In Gujarati a modifying phrase precedes its noun, so near the school comes before hall: શાળાની પાસેના હોલમાં. Note what has happened to પાસે — because it is now modifying a noun rather than heading a phrase, it takes the genitive -ના, agreeing with હોલ. This is a step candidates almost always miss and it is the difference between the hall near the school and near the school, the hall.

  3. 03Put the verb last and the subject first

    The subject is શિક્ષક, the teacher. The verb is ગયા, went — and note the honorific plural agreement, ગયા rather than ગયો, which is standard when writing respectfully about a teacher. જવું is intransitive, so no ergative appears anywhere in this sentence, however past it is.

  4. 04Assemble in Gujarati order and check the five decisions

    વરસાદને કારણે શિક્ષક બાળકોની સાથે મેદાનમાં જવાને બદલે શાળાની પાસેના હોલમાં ગયા. Reread it against the list: ને કારણે with the dative; ની સાથે with the genitive; ને બદલે after the verbal noun જવા; ની પાસેના with the genitive twice over; -માં on the destination; verb last; no ergative because the verb is intransitive.

Result: વરસાદને કારણે શિક્ષક બાળકોની સાથે મેદાનમાં જવાને બદલે શાળાની પાસેના હોલમાં ગયા. Five English prepositions became five separate Gujarati decisions, of which two required a genitive and one required the genitive to agree with a following noun. Working through them in order, rather than translating the sentence as a whole, is what makes this reliable.

Exam focus

  • Postpositions follow. When translating from English, find the noun first and attach behind it.
  • The oblique rule is one line: masculine and neuter nouns in -ો and -ું go to -ા; everything else is unchanged.
  • Primary case markers attach directly; compound postpositions need a genitive in front. મારા માટે, not મને માટે.
  • The genitive agrees with the possessed noun. રામનો ભાઈ but રામની બહેન.

Typical mistakes

  • Writing મુજબ or માટે before the noun, on the English pattern. They follow.
  • Forgetting the oblique: છોકરોને instead of છોકરાને. It is the most visible beginner error in written Gujarati and it survives into A-Level work.
  • Making the genitive agree with the possessor. It agrees with what is possessed.
  • Using -ને on every direct object. It marks a specific or animate object; an indefinite inanimate object usually takes no marker, and over-marking changes the verb agreement in the perfective.

Active revision

નીચેનાં દસ અંગ્રેજી શબ્દસમૂહોનું ગુજરાતીમાં ભાષાંતર કરો અને દરેક પછી લખો કે તમે પ્રાથમિક વિભક્તિ વાપરી કે સંયુક્ત નામયોગી: in the house; for my sister; near the school; after two years; with the teacher; from the village; on the table; because of the rain; about the film; between the two cities.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Gujarati (9GU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 03

Gender, number and agreement across three genders#

●●○StandardLPPearson Edexcel 9GU0 — Appendix 2: Grammar list — Nouns: gender, singular and plural; Adjectives: variable and non-variable, agreement

Three genders, their endings and their agreement

Gender and agreementTable with 5 columns and 4 rows, Data: Gender · In Gujarati · Singular · Plural · With the adjective big; Masculine · નર · -ો · -ા · મોટો છોકરો, મોટા છોકરાઓ; Feminine · નારી · -ી · -ીઓ · મોટી છોકરી, મોટી છોકરીઓ; Neuter · નાન્યતર · -ું · -આં · મોટું ઘર, મોટાં ઘરો; No ending · વ્યંજનાંત · none · -ો usually · Gender must be learned: હાથ is masculine, વાત feminine, પુસ્તક neuter, highlighted cell: NeuterGENDERIN GUJARATISINGULARPLURALWITH THE ADJECTIVE BIGMASCULINEનર-ો-ામોટો છોકરો, મોટા છોકરાઓFEMININEનારી-ી-ીઓમોટી છોકરી, મોટી છોકરીઓNEUTERનાન્યતર-ું-આંમોટું ઘર, મોટાં ઘરોNO ENDINGવ્યંજનાંતnone-ો usuallyGender must be learned: હાથis masculine, વાત feminine,પુસ્તક neuter
Fig. 2The three genders with their typical singular and plural markers, the form a variable adjective takes with each, and a specimen noun. The final column is the reminder that a large class of nouns ends in a consonant and gives no signal at all, which is why gender has to be learned with the word. The row in heavier ink is the neuter, which has no counterpart in the languages most candidates compare Gujarati with and is therefore where errors concentrate.

Key points

Gujarati has three genders and the specification names them in Gujarati: નર masculine, નારી feminine, નાન્યતર neuter. The third is what makes Gujarati harder than Hindi or Urdu for an English speaker, because a whole extra set of endings has to be kept straight. The typical marks are -ો masculine, -ી feminine, -ું neuter — છોકરો a boy, છોકરી a girl, છોકરું a child — but a large proportion of nouns end in a consonant and give no clue at all: ઘર house is neuter, હાથ hand is masculine, વાત a matter or thing said is feminine, પુસ્તક a book is neuter. Gender is therefore something you learn with the word, not something you deduce from it, and the only reliable method is to learn every new noun with an adjective attached.
The specification also names dual-gender nouns and gives two examples, સવાર and ઘડિયાળ, which may be treated as masculine or feminine. They are a small class and they are worth knowing chiefly so that you are not thrown when a source uses one differently from the way you learned it. What matters far more is the plural. Masculine nouns in -ો take -ા in the plural; neuter nouns in -ું take -આં; feminine nouns in -ી take -ીઓ; and consonant-final nouns generally take -ો. The specification's own examples are પર્વતો mountains, નદીઓ rivers and ઝરણાંઓ streams — one from each of three classes, which is a compact way of remembering all three.
Adjectives divide into two classes and only one of them agrees. Variable adjectives end in a vowel and take the same endings as the nouns: મોટો, મોટી, મોટું, plural મોટા and મોટાં. So મોટો છોકરો, મોટી છોકરી, મોટું ઘર, મોટા છોકરાઓ, મોટાં ઘરો. Non-variable adjectives do not change at all: સુંદર beautiful, સ્વચ્છ clean, ખરાબ bad, લાલ red, હોશિયાર clever, જરૂરી necessary — સુંદર છોકરો, સુંદર છોકરી, સુંદર ઘર. The specification's grammar list gives મોટો and સુંદર as its examples of the two classes, so learning which class an adjective belongs to is explicitly part of the assessed content.
The specification then does something unusually useful: it prints its own examples of agreement errors and classifies them by how much damage they do. વેગવંતો ઘોડી, a masculine adjective on a feminine noun meaning a swift mare, and બટકબોલી છોકરો, a feminine adjective on a masculine noun meaning a chatty boy, are listed as errors that do NOT hinder clarity — the reader understands, and the error costs AO3 marks rather than communication. That is a precise and encouraging piece of information: agreement errors will not destroy your answer, but with AO3 carrying 30 per cent of the qualification they will quietly bleed it. Fix them in the final reading of every piece you write.
Worked example

Correcting the specification's own error examples

The specification prints વેગવંતો ઘોડી and બટકબોલી છોકરો as examples of errors that do not hinder clarity. Diagnose each, correct it, and then say what a marker does with it.

  1. 01Diagnose the first

    ઘોડી is a mare, feminine, from ઘોડો a horse. વેગવંતો, swift, is a variable adjective and has taken the masculine -ો. The agreement is therefore wrong in gender. Corrected: વેગવંતી ઘોડી. Note that the meaning was never in doubt — a reader knows a mare is meant — which is exactly why the specification files it under errors that do not hinder clarity.

  2. 02Diagnose the second

    છોકરો is a boy, masculine. બટકબોલી, chatty or given to pert speech, is a variable adjective wearing the feminine -ી. Corrected: બટકબોલો છોકરો. The same diagnosis in the opposite direction, and again the meaning survives.

  3. 03Understand what the classification is telling you

    The specification's accuracy grid describes bands by the frequency of errors and their impact on clarity. An error that does not hinder clarity does not push you into the bottom bands — but the top band requires accurate language throughout, so a scattering of agreement errors caps you below it. In a Paper 2 essay marked out of 45 with 10 marks for accuracy alone, that cap is worth two or three marks per essay and four to six across the paper.

  4. 04Build the habit that prevents it

    The fix is a final reading with one job only: find every variable adjective and every participle, look back to its noun, and check gender and number. Nothing else. Doing this as a separate pass takes ninety seconds and catches almost all of them, because the errors arise from writing forward at speed rather than from not knowing the rule.

Result: વેગવંતી ઘોડી and બટકબોલો છોકરો. Both errors were of the class the specification says does not hinder clarity, which means they cost AO3 marks quietly rather than loudly — and a single dedicated agreement pass at the end of every written answer removes nearly all of them.

Exam focus

  • Learn every noun with its gender, and learn it by attaching an adjective: મોટું ઘર, not just ઘર.
  • Variable adjectives agree; non-variable ones do not. The specification names મોટો and સુંદર as its examples of the two classes.
  • Three plural patterns, from the specification's own examples: પર્વતો, નદીઓ, ઝરણાંઓ.
  • Agreement errors are classified by the specification as not hindering clarity. They cost AO3 marks, and AO3 is 30 per cent of the qualification.

Typical mistakes

  • Assuming a consonant-final noun is masculine. ઘર and પુસ્તક are neuter; વાત is feminine.
  • Making a non-variable adjective agree: સુંદરી છોકરી is not an agreement, it is a different word.
  • Forgetting that the neuter plural ends in -આં with the candrabindu-like anusvara, and writing -આ. It is a visible error.
  • Letting agreement drift over a long sentence. The noun is at the start and the participle at the end, and by the time you reach the verb it is easy to have forgotten the gender.

Active revision

નીચેનાં દસ નામ સાથે મોટો અને સુંદર બંને વિશેષણ જોડીને ગુજરાતીમાં લખો, એકવચન અને બહુવચન બંનેમાં: છોકરો, છોકરી, ઘર, પુસ્તક, નદી, પર્વત, વાત, ઝરણું, હાથ, શાળા. પછી નોંધો કે કયું વિશેષણ બદલાયું અને કયું ન બદલાયું.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Gujarati (9GU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 04

The verb: tense, aspect, and the ergative perfective#

●●●AdvancedLPPearson Edexcel 9GU0 — Appendix 2: Grammar list — Verbs; Use of tenses; Participles; VoiceLPPearson Edexcel 9GU0 — Paper 2 Section A

When the ergative appears, and what the verb then agrees with

Ergative alignment in GujaratiTable with 4 columns and 4 rows, Data: Clause type · Agent takes -એ? · Verb agrees with · Example; Any imperfective · No · The subject · હું પત્ર લખું છું — I write a letter; Perfective, intransitive · No · The subject · છોકરી ગઈ — the girl went; Perfective, transitive, object unmarked · Yes · The direct object · મેં ચિઠ્ઠી લખી — I wrote a note; Perfective, transitive, object marked -ને · Yes · Nothing; default neuter singular · મેં તેને બોલાવ્યું — I called him or her, highlighted cell: Perfective, transitive, object marked -નેCLAUSE TYPEAGENT TAKES -એ?VERB AGREES WITHEXAMPLEANY IMPERFECTIVENoThe subjectહું પત્ર લખું છું — I writea letterPERFECTIVE,INTRANSITIVENoThe subjectછોકરી ગઈ — the girl wentPERFECTIVE,TRANSITIVE, OBJECTUNMARKEDYesThe direct objectમેં ચિઠ્ઠી લખી — I wrote anotePERFECTIVE,TRANSITIVE, OBJECTMARKED -નેYesNothing; default neutersingularમેં તેને બોલાવ્યું — Icalled him or her
Fig. 3Four clause types, only one of which is ergative. The right-hand column is the check to run on every past-tense Gujarati sentence you write: find what the verb is agreeing with, and confirm it is the right thing. The row in heavier ink is the case candidates most often get wrong, because the object marker -ને removes the verb's agreement target and the participle falls back to a default.

Key points

The single structure that most reliably separates a candidate who has learned Gujarati from one who has learned to recognise it is the ergative. The rule is this: in a perfective transitive clause the agent takes the marker -એ, and the verb does not agree with that agent at all — it agrees with the direct object. મેં પત્ર લખ્યો, I wrote a letter, with લખ્યો masculine because પત્ર is masculine. મેં ચિઠ્ઠી લખી, I wrote a note, with લખી feminine because ચિઠ્ઠી is feminine. મેં પુસ્તક વાંચ્યું, I read a book, neuter. મેં પુસ્તકો વાંચ્યાં, I read books, neuter plural. The pronouns have their own ergative forms: હું gives મેં, તું gives તેં, તે gives તેણે, and તેઓ gives તેમણે, while અમે, આપણે and તમે are unchanged.
Three qualifications complete the rule and each is examinable. First, only PERFECTIVE clauses are ergative: the present, the imperfect, the future and the continuous all have ordinary nominative subjects with the verb agreeing with the subject. હું પત્ર લખું છું, I write a letter, has no -એ anywhere. Second, only TRANSITIVE verbs are ergative: an intransitive perfective takes no -એ and agrees with its subject, as in રાજા સૂતો, the king slept, and છોકરી ગઈ, the girl went. Third, when the direct object is itself marked with -ને, the verb can no longer agree with it, and in the standard written language it stands in the default neuter singular in -ું. You will hear agreement with the object's own gender in speech; write the neuter default in an examination.
The tense and aspect system is otherwise regular and can be built from three components: a stem, a participle, and an auxiliary. From કરવું, to do: present habitual હું કરું છું; present continuous હું કરી રહ્યો છું; habitual past હું કરતો હતો; simple perfective મેં કર્યું; present perfect મેં કર્યું છે; pluperfect મેં કર્યું હતું; future હું કરીશ, તે કરશે; future perfect મેં કર્યું હશે; contrafactual conditional હું કરત. The specification's list of what counts as complex language names the pluperfect and the future perfect explicitly, so those two forms are worth deliberate use in any extended answer.
Two further systems belong here because the specification lists them. The passive: the agentless form is built on the verbal noun in the locative plus આવવું — કરવામાં આવે છે it is done, કહેવામાં આવ્યું it was said, જણાવવામાં આવ્યું છે it has been stated. There is also a capability or dispositional passive with the suffix -આવું and an instrumental agent in -થી, which is the construction the specification illustrates with મારાથી આ કામ થાય છે, this work gets done by me. And the participles: past બગડેલા spoiled, present ચાલતા walking, future આવનાર forthcoming, and the conjunctive જોઈને having seen, કરીને having done — the last of these being the ordinary way Gujarati chains actions, and something English must usually unpack into a clause.

The tense and aspect ladder, built on કરવું

કરવું through the tensesTable with 3 columns and 10 rows, Data: Tense or aspect · First person · Note; Present habitual · હું કરું છું · The default present; no ergative; Present continuous · હું કરી રહ્યો છું · The participle agrees with the speaker's gender; Habitual past · હું કરતો હતો · Used to do; the imperfective participle plus હતો; Perfective · મેં કર્યું · Ergative; the verb agrees with the object; Present perfect · મેં કર્યું છે · Have done; contrast with the plain perfective; Pluperfect · મેં કર્યું હતું · Named by the specification as complex language; Future · હું કરીશ · Third person takes કરશે; Future perfect · મેં કર્યું હશે · Also named as complex language; Conditional · હું કરત · Contrafactual; pairs with જો and તો; Passive · કરવામાં આવે છે · Agentless; the register of reporting a claim, highlighted cell: PluperfectTENSE OR ASPECTFIRST PERSONNOTEPRESENT HABITUALહું કરું છુંThe default present; noergativePRESENT CONTINUOUSહું કરી રહ્યો છુંThe participle agrees withthe speaker's genderHABITUAL PASTહું કરતો હતોUsed to do; the imperfectiveparticiple plus હતોPERFECTIVEમેં કર્યુંErgative; the verb agreeswith the objectPRESENT PERFECTમેં કર્યું છેHave done; contrast with theplain perfectivePLUPERFECTમેં કર્યું હતુંNamed by the specificationas complex languageFUTUREહું કરીશThird person takes કરશેFUTURE PERFECTમેં કર્યું હશેAlso named as complexlanguageCONDITIONALહું કરતContrafactual; pairs with જોand તોPASSIVEકરવામાં આવે છેAgentless; the register ofreporting a claim
Fig. 4One verb through the whole system, with the specification's own definition of complex language marking which rungs are worth reaching for deliberately in an extended answer. The row in heavier ink is the pluperfect, which the specification names as conceptually challenging and which is therefore among the cheapest ways to demonstrate range.
Worked example

Paper 2 Section A: a paragraph engineered to test the ergative four times

Translate into Gujarati: The committee wrote a letter. It read the report and accepted the recommendations. The secretary had already sent a note to the members, but nobody had replied. If they had answered earlier, the decision would have been taken last month.

  1. 01Sentence one: the basic ergative

    The committee wrote a letter becomes સમિતિએ પત્ર લખ્યો. સમિતિ takes the ergative -એ because લખવું is transitive and the clause is perfective; પત્ર is masculine singular and unmarked, so the verb agrees with it as લખ્યો. Note what did NOT happen: the verb has not agreed with સમિતિ, which is feminine.

  2. 02Sentence two: the same rule twice, with two different objects

    It read the report becomes તેણે અહેવાલ વાંચ્યો — ergative તેણે, and વાંચ્યો masculine because અહેવાલ is masculine. and accepted the recommendations becomes અને ભલામણો સ્વીકારી — ભલામણ is feminine, plural ભલામણો, so the verb is સ્વીકારી. The two verbs in one sentence take different endings because their objects have different genders, which is the whole point of the exercise.

  3. 03Sentence three: the pluperfect, and an object marked with -ને

    The secretary had already sent a note to the members becomes મંત્રીએ સભ્યોને પહેલેથી જ ચિઠ્ઠી મોકલી હતી. The ergative is on મંત્રી; સભ્યોને is the indirect object with -ને; the direct object ચિઠ્ઠી is feminine and unmarked, so the verb agrees with it, મોકલી, and હતી makes it pluperfect and agrees too. but nobody had replied becomes પણ કોઈએ જવાબ આપ્યો નહોતો — કોઈએ carries the ergative even though it is nobody, because આપવું is transitive, and the verb agrees with the masculine જવાબ.

  4. 04Sentence four: the contrafactual conditional

    If they had answered earlier becomes જો તેમણે વહેલો જવાબ આપ્યો હોત — the ergative તેમણે, and આપ્યો હોત as the contrafactual. the decision would have been taken last month becomes તો ગયા મહિને નિર્ણય લેવાયો હોત, with the passive લેવાવું and again હોત. The જો… તો… pair must both be present. This sentence alone supplies a conditional, a contrafactual and a passive, all three of which the specification names as complex language.

  5. 05Run the ergative audit

    Five perfective transitive clauses: સમિતિએ, તેણે, મંત્રીએ, કોઈએ, તેમણે — five ergatives, all present. Five agreements: લખ્યો with પત્ર, વાંચ્યો with અહેવાલ, સ્વીકારી with ભલામણો, મોકલી હતી with ચિઠ્ઠી, આપ્યો નહોતો with જવાબ. Every one of those is a markable stretch under the points-based scheme.

Result: સમિતિએ પત્ર લખ્યો। તેણે અહેવાલ વાંચ્યો અને ભલામણો સ્વીકારી। મંત્રીએ સભ્યોને પહેલેથી જ ચિઠ્ઠી મોકલી હતી, પણ કોઈએ જવાબ આપ્યો નહોતો। જો તેમણે વહેલો જવાબ આપ્યો હોત તો ગયા મહિને નિર્ણય લેવાયો હોત। Five ergatives, five object agreements, one pluperfect and one contrafactual conditional — the paragraph is a checklist for the whole system.

Exam focus

  • Ergative equals perfective plus transitive. Neither alone triggers it, and applying it to an intransitive past is a visible error.
  • In an ergative clause the verb agrees with the OBJECT, not with the agent. This is the check to run on every past-tense sentence you write in Gujarati.
  • The pluperfect and the future perfect are named in the specification's own definition of complex language. Use them on purpose in extended writing.
  • The conjunctive participle in -ઈને is how Gujarati chains actions. Translating into English it becomes having done or a coordinated clause; translating into Gujarati it lets you compress two English sentences into one.

Typical mistakes

  • Putting -એ on the subject of an intransitive perfective. છોકરીએ ગઈ is wrong; છોકરી ગઈ is right.
  • Making the perfective verb agree with the agent. મેં ચિઠ્ઠી લખ્યો is wrong; the object ચિઠ્ઠી is feminine so it must be લખી.
  • Forgetting that -ને on the object switches the verb to the default neuter singular.
  • Using the simple perfective where English has a present perfect. મેં કર્યું is I did; મેં કર્યું છે is I have done, and the difference carries marks in both directions of translation.

Active revision

નીચેનાં દસ વાક્યો ગુજરાતીમાં લખો અને દરેક પછી લખો કે તેમાં કર્તરિ પ્રત્યય -એ કેમ છે કે કેમ નથી: I wrote a letter. I write letters. The girl went. She read the book. They have read the books. We had done the work. He will do it. The work is done by me. Having seen the film, he wrote a review. It was said that the road would be built.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Gujarati (9GU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 05

Register, honorifics and the errors the specification itself lists#

●●●AdvancedLPPearson Edexcel 9GU0 — Appendix 2: Grammar list — Pronouns: personal, reflexive, relative; Verbs: modes of addressLPPearson Edexcel 9GU0 — Marking guidance: errors that do not hinder clarity, hinder clarity, and prevent meaning

The registers of address, and where each belongs

Address and honorific registerTable with 4 columns and 4 rows, Data: Pronoun · Is · Perfective · Where it belongs; તું · છે · તું ગયો, તેં કહ્યું · Intimate speech; never in an examination answer; તમે · છો · તમે ગયા, તમે કહ્યું · The default for all written work in this qualification; આપ · છો · આપ ગયા, આપે કહ્યું · Formal register: a letter, a respectful address to a reader; તેઓ · છે · તેઓ ગયા, તેમણે કહ્યું · Honorific third person for one respected individual, highlighted cell: તમેPRONOUNISPERFECTIVEWHERE IT BELONGSતુંછેતું ગયો, તેં કહ્યુંIntimate speech; never in anexamination answerતમેછોતમે ગયા, તમે કહ્યુંThe default for all writtenwork in this qualificationઆપછોઆપ ગયા, આપે કહ્યુંFormal register: a letter, arespectful address to areaderતેઓછેતેઓ ગયા, તેમણે કહ્યુંHonorific third person forone respected individual
Fig. 5Three second-person forms and the honorific third person, with the verb forms each takes and the setting each belongs to. The last column is the one that matters in an examination: only two of these four rows belong in anything you write for this qualification. The row in heavier ink is the default for every piece of writing you will produce.

Key points

Gujarati has three levels of second-person address and choosing among them is a decision an examiner reads immediately. તું is intimate, used to a close friend, a young child or in some regional and devotional registers; its verb forms are distinct — તું છે, તું કરે છે, તું ગયો. તમે is the polite and the plural at once: તમે છો, તમે કરો છો, તમે ગયા. આપ is the formal and deferential form, taking the same verb forms as તમે but a higher register, and it is the one to use in a formal letter or when addressing a reader with respect. In an examination answer the safe default is તમે, and આપ where the register is explicitly formal. તું should not appear.
The third person has an honorific plural too, and it is the one candidates most often miss. When writing respectfully about one person — a teacher, an elder, a public figure — Gujarati uses the plural: તેઓ આવ્યા, he or she came, literally they came, with plural agreement throughout the sentence. In the ergative that is તેમણે rather than તેણે. The suffix -જી attaches to a name or title to show respect, as in ગાંધીજી, and the titles શ્રી, શ્રીમતી and કુમારી precede a name. A few verbs have honorific counterparts: પધારવું for coming or going, જમવું for eating. Using the honorific plural consistently through a paragraph about one respected person is a small thing that reads as fluency.
The specification's marking guidance contains a piece of information no textbook can give you: its own worked examples of errors, classified by the damage they do. Errors that do not hinder clarity are gender and adjectival agreement mismatches, and it prints વેગવંતો ઘોડી and બટકબોલી છોકરો. Errors that hinder clarity are inappropriate tense formation and wrong case endings, and it prints મહેશ ગયા અઠવાડિયે દુકાનમાં જઈને ખરીદી કરી છે — a present perfect attached to last week — and આવતાં છ મહિનામાં આ શહેરનો વિકાસ ન થયો — a simple past attached to the coming six months. Errors that prevent meaning are those that make it unclear who is carrying out the action, and it prints તેના પિતાઓએ બધાને ગુસ્સો કર્યો and દાન આપણે ભેગા કર્યો.
That classification is worth converting into a proofreading order, because it tells you what to fix first when time is short. Fix the meaning-preventing errors first: check that every clause has an identifiable agent, that the person of the verb matches it, and that the ergative and the agreement point at the right things — in દાન આપણે ભેગા કર્યો, for instance, દાન is neuter singular, so the phrase needs ભેગું કર્યું, and as written a marker cannot tell what agrees with what. Fix the clarity-hindering errors second: reread every verb against its time expression, because a tense that contradicts its adverbial is the specification's own example of an error that forces the reader to reread. Fix agreement last. Most candidates do it in exactly the reverse order.
Worked example

Correcting the specification's three severer error examples

Diagnose and correct the specification's own examples of errors that hinder clarity and errors that prevent meaning: મહેશ ગયા અઠવાડિયે દુકાનમાં જઈને ખરીદી કરી છે; આવતાં છ મહિનામાં આ શહેરનો વિકાસ ન થયો; દાન આપણે ભેગા કર્યો.

  1. 01The first: a tense that contradicts its time expression

    ગયા અઠવાડિયે means last week, a completed period. કરી છે is a present perfect, which in Gujarati as in English resists a specific completed past time reference. The reader has to stop and work out whether the shopping happened last week or is being reported as a current state. Corrected: મહેશે ગયા અઠવાડિયે દુકાનમાં જઈને ખરીદી કરી. Note that the correction also supplies the ergative on મહેશ, which the original lacked — કરવી is transitive and the clause is now plainly perfective.

  2. 02The second: the same fault in the other direction

    આવતાં છ મહિનામાં means in the coming six months, a future period. ન થયો is a simple past negative. Future time with past tense is exactly the mismatch the specification is illustrating. What was probably meant is a prediction or a conditional: આવતાં છ મહિનામાં આ શહેરનો વિકાસ નહીં થાય, the city will not develop in the coming six months, or with a conditional, જો રોકાણ ન આવે તો આવતાં છ મહિનામાં વિકાસ નહીં થાય.

  3. 03The third: agreement that leaves the reader unable to parse the clause

    દાન is a neuter singular noun, a donation or gift. ભેગા is a masculine plural form and કર્યો is a masculine singular participle, so three elements of one clause disagree with each other and none agrees with the noun. The specification files this among errors that prevent meaning because a reader cannot tell what is being said to have been collected. Corrected: આપણે દાન ભેગું કર્યું — with the neuter singular throughout, and with આપણે as the ergative form, which for the first person plural is identical to the nominative.

  4. 04Extract the proofreading order

    The three examples give you the order in which to reread. First, for every clause: who is doing this, and does the verb say so? Second, for every verb: does its tense match the time expression beside it? Third, for every adjective and participle: does it agree with its noun? The specification has effectively published its own marking priorities, and rereading in its order rather than in the order errors happen to catch your eye is worth real marks under time pressure.

Result: મહેશે ગયા અઠવાડિયે દુકાનમાં જઈને ખરીદી કરી; આવતાં છ મહિનામાં આ શહેરનો વિકાસ નહીં થાય; આપણે દાન ભેગું કર્યું. The specification's own three-level classification of error severity converts directly into a three-pass proofreading order — agent and person, then tense against time, then agreement.

Exam focus

  • તમે is the safe default; આપ for formal register; તું never, in an examination answer.
  • Use the honorific plural for a respected individual, and keep it consistent: તેઓ આવ્યા, તેમણે કહ્યું.
  • The specification classifies its own error examples into three severities. Proofread in that order: agent and person first, tense against time expression second, agreement third.
  • A tense that contradicts its time adverbial is the specification's own example of an error that hinders clarity. Check every verb against every time phrase.

Typical mistakes

  • Sliding between તું and તમે within one piece of writing. Choose one and hold it.
  • Using the singular for a respected third person after having used the plural. Consistency is the whole effect.
  • Attaching a present perfect to a completed past time expression, as in the specification's મહેશ ગયા અઠવાડિયે… ખરીદી કરી છે. Last week requires a simple perfective.
  • Proofreading for agreement first. It is the least damaging error class and it consumes the time needed for the two more serious ones.

Active revision

નીચેનાં ત્રણ ખોટાં વાક્યો સુધારો અને દરેક માટે લખો કે એ કઈ પ્રકારની ભૂલ છે — અર્થ અટકાવનારી, સ્પષ્ટતા ઘટાડનારી કે માત્ર સંવાદની: (૧) મહેશ ગયા અઠવાડિયે દુકાનમાં જઈને ખરીદી કરી છે. (૨) આવતાં છ મહિનામાં આ શહેરનો વિકાસ ન થયો. (૩) દાન આપણે ભેગા કર્યો.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Gujarati (9GU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

Contents

Section -- / 05

    • 01What the two translation tasks actually mark○
    • 02Nouns, the oblique and the postposition system◐
    • 03Gender, number and agreement across three genders◐
    • 04The verb: tense, aspect, and the ergative perfective●
    • 05Register, honorifics and the errors the specification itself lists●

0/5 Read

From notes into training

વ્યાકરણ અને અનુવાદ: the grammar list and the two translation tasks

Reinforce this topic with matching tasks from the question bank.

~32
min
4
Competencies
Practise

References & sources

Sources

Pearson Edexcel

  • Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Gujarati (9GU0) specification

Previous topic

મુખ્ય વિષય ૪, પેટા-વિષય ૨: ગુજરાત રાજ્યનાં રાજકીય પાસાં

Next topic

વાંચન: Paper 1 Section B and the reading that runs through the whole paper

EuraStudy·Notes T·07·MMXXVI

Carry on to the next topic — your learning path is kept.