EuraStudy
This chapter examines farming as a managed ecosystem designed to maximise the food harvested from net primary productivity. It compares agroecosystems with natural ecosystems, examines the abiotic and biotic factors manipulated to raise yield and the methods of pest control, sets out the environmental impacts of agriculture, and evaluates sustainable and lower-impact farming and its implications for food security.
4 sections~13 min reading time3 competenciesLevel Standard 3 · Advanced 1
basic level
AS-Level expects you to describe how farming raises yield, the main environmental impacts and the main sustainable methods.
higher level
The full A-Level requires quantitative reasoning about productivity and efficiency and the evaluation of intensive versus sustainable systems.
Reading depth: In depth
Text size: Standard
Natural ecosystem versus agroecosystem
A hectare of land can produce grain containing 30 million kJ of food energy. If the grain is instead fed to cattle, explain roughly how much food energy people obtain and why.
Eaten directly, the grain provides people with about 30 million kJ of food energy from the hectare.
Feeding the grain to cattle adds a trophic level; only about 10% of the energy is transferred to the animals' edible tissue, so people obtain roughly 3 million kJ.
Energy is lost as heat and in waste at each transfer, so eating plants directly captures far more food energy per hectare than eating animals fed on those plants.
Result: Direct grain gives about 30 million kJ, but via cattle only about 3 million kJ, because energy is lost at the extra trophic level.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Explain why a field of a single crop needs regular inputs of fertiliser and pesticide to remain productive, whereas a nearby wood does not.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: AQA AS and A-level Environmental Science (7447) specification (AQA) · GCE AS and A level subject content (Department for Education)
The yield response to fertiliser
Methods of pest control
A grower's crop is attacked by aphids. Compare using a chemical pesticide with introducing ladybirds, and recommend an approach.
Kills aphids quickly and reliably, but may harm pollinators and the ladybirds themselves, can persist and biomagnify, and selects for resistant aphids.
Introducing ladybirds, a natural predator, avoids chemicals and is self-sustaining, but acts more slowly and less predictably and cannot eliminate the pest completely.
Use integrated pest management: rely on the ladybirds and monitoring, applying a targeted pesticide only if the aphids exceed a damaging threshold, to control the pest with least harm.
Result: Integrated pest management, favouring biological control and using pesticide only when needed, controls the aphids with least environmental harm.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
A graph shows crop yield rising then falling as fertiliser is increased. Explain the shape of the graph and identify the best rate of application.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: AQA AS and A-level Environmental Science (7447) specification (AQA) · GCE AS and A level subject content (Department for Education)
The environmental impacts of intensive agriculture
A river running through intensively farmed land suffers eutrophication and a decline in insect-eating birds. Explain how farming practices could cause both.
Nitrogen and phosphate fertiliser runs off the fields into the river, enriching it and causing an algal bloom whose decomposition removes oxygen (eutrophication).
Pesticides reduce the insect populations the birds feed on, and persistent pesticides can biomagnify and poison the birds directly.
Both impacts arise from inputs used to raise yield, showing that intensification concentrates pollution and biodiversity loss.
Result: Fertiliser runoff causes eutrophication and pesticides reduce insects and biomagnify, so both impacts trace to yield-raising inputs.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Explain how the fertiliser and pesticides used to raise crop yields can damage nearby aquatic ecosystems.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: AQA AS and A-level Environmental Science (7447) specification (AQA) · GCE AS and A level subject content (Department for Education)
Sustainable farming methods
A region must increase food production while protecting a river from eutrophication. Compare intensifying with adopting sustainable methods and recommend an approach.
More fertiliser and pesticide would raise yield per hectare but worsen the runoff that causes eutrophication, so it conflicts with protecting the river.
Crop rotation, precise fertiliser use, cover crops and buffer strips reduce runoff and protect the river, but may give a somewhat lower yield per hectare.
Adopt precision and sustainable methods that maintain most of the yield while cutting runoff, combined with reducing food waste, rather than intensifying in a way that would harm the river.
Result: Sustainable and precision methods best reconcile higher production with protecting the river, whereas simple intensification would worsen eutrophication.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Evaluate whether a country facing rising food demand should encourage organic farming, considering yield, environmental impact and land use.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: AQA AS and A-level Environmental Science (7447) specification (AQA) · GCE AS and A level subject content (Department for Education)
References & sources
Department for Education