EuraStudy
This chapter covers making accurately and managing the making: selecting the right tools and processes, working to precision and tolerance (including tolerance limits and stack-up), assuring and controlling quality, and planning a project with flowcharts, Gantt charts and critical-path thinking. It develops the quantitative handling of tolerance alongside the judgement of quality and planning.
4 sections~15 min reading time3 competenciesLevel Standard 3 · Advanced 1
basic level
AS-Level expects tool selection, the idea of tolerance, and basic quality control and planning understood.
higher level
The full A-Level expects tolerances and limits calculated (including stack-up), quality assurance distinguished from control, and a project planned with critical-path thinking.
Reading depth: In depth
Text size: Standard
A workshop must make 40 identical metal plates, each with two holes positioned to plus or minus 0.1 mm. Select tools and equipment and justify them.
Use a digital calliper (reading to about 0.02 mm) rather than a steel rule to set out and check the hole positions, because the plus or minus 0.1 mm tolerance is finer than a rule can achieve.
Use a drilling jig to position the holes identically on every plate, so all 40 match without marking out each one by hand - the jig guarantees the repeatable accuracy a batch needs.
Drill on a pillar drill (or CNC) for accurate, square holes; CNC would give the highest repeatability if the volume or precision justified its set-up.
Result: A digital calliper meets the plus or minus 0.1 mm measuring precision, a drilling jig gives repeatable hole positions across all 40 plates, and a pillar drill or CNC provides accurate holes - tools and equipment matched to the tolerance and the batch.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
A batch of parts must be drilled to matching hole positions and measured to plus or minus 0.05 mm. Select suitable tools and equipment and justify each against the accuracy and repeatability required.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: GCE AS and A level subject content for design and technology (Department for Education) · AQA A-level Design and Technology: Product Design (7552) specification (AQA)
Tolerance: nominal size and limits
Tolerance
The permitted variation in a dimension: the difference between the largest and smallest acceptable sizes. For a bilateral tolerance it is twice the plus-or-minus value.
Tolerance stack-up
When parts are assembled end to end, their tolerances add, so the overall dimension can vary by the sum of the individual tolerances.
(a) A dimension is 50 plus or minus 0.1 mm. State the upper and lower limits and the tolerance. (b) Three spacers, each 20 plus or minus 0.1 mm, are stacked. Find the nominal total length, the total tolerance, and the maximum and minimum overall length.
Upper limit = 50 + 0.1 = 50.1 mm; lower limit = 50 - 0.1 = 49.9 mm.
Tolerance = upper - lower = 50.1 - 49.9 = 0.2 mm (twice the plus-or-minus value).
Nominal total = 3 x 20 = 60 mm. Total tolerance = sum of individual tolerances = 3 x 0.2 = 0.6 mm, so 60 plus or minus 0.3 mm.
Maximum = 60 + 0.3 = 60.3 mm; minimum = 60 - 0.3 = 59.7 mm. The assembly can vary by 0.6 mm even though each spacer is within 0.2 mm - stack-up magnifies the variation, which the designer must allow for.
Result: The single dimension has limits 50.1 and 49.9 mm and a 0.2 mm tolerance; three stacked spacers give 60 plus or minus 0.3 mm (60.3 to 59.7 mm) - the tolerances add, so the assembly varies more than any single part.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
A shaft is specified as 25 +0.00 / -0.04 mm. State its upper and lower limits and its tolerance. Then find the total length and tolerance if four such shafts are placed end to end.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: AQA A-level Design and Technology: Product Design (7552) specification (AQA)
Quality assurance and quality control
A firm mass-produces plastic connectors that must fit a socket within a tight tolerance. Explain how QA and QC would ensure quality.
Design a reliable moulding process with controlled temperatures and a well-made mould, set achievable tolerances, train operators, and work to a certified quality-management system (ISO 9001) so faults are prevented before they happen.
Check the connectors against their limits: a go/no-go gauge quickly passes or fails each sampled connector without measuring the exact size, and statistical process control charts the results to catch the process drifting out of tolerance before scrap is made.
QA keeps the process producing good parts and QC verifies the output, so the connectors consistently fit - prevention and detection working together rather than relying on inspecting quality in at the end.
Result: QA designs a reliable, standardised, trained process that prevents faults, while QC uses go/no-go gauges and statistical process control on samples to detect any that slip through - together ensuring the connectors consistently meet their tolerance.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Explain how a factory making thousands of identical machined pins would use quality assurance and quality control, including a go/no-go gauge, to ensure the pins meet their tolerance.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: AQA A-level Design and Technology: Product Design (7552) specification (AQA)
Task dependencies and the critical path
A student must plan the making of a bedside clock: designing and detailing, ordering materials, making the case, making the mechanism mount, assembling and testing. Explain how to plan it and find the critical path.
Designing must come first; ordering materials and preparing jigs can run in parallel with finishing the detailing; making the case and the mount can proceed once materials arrive; assembly needs both parts; testing follows assembly.
Place each task as a bar against a timeline, overlapping the independent tasks (ordering while detailing) to save time and marking milestones (materials in, parts made, assembled).
The longest chain of dependent tasks - design, then make parts (whichever part takes longest), then assemble, then test - is the critical path; any delay to a task on it delays the whole clock, so effort and contingency focus there, while off-path tasks have slack.
Result: The clock is planned on a Gantt chart with ordering run in parallel with detailing to save time; the critical path (design to longest part to assembly to test) sets the minimum duration, so delays there delay the project - the focus of project management.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
Draw up a simple plan for making a small batch of clocks, showing which tasks can run in parallel and which are dependent, and identify the critical path.
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: GCE AS and A level subject content for design and technology (Department for Education) · AQA A-level Design and Technology: Product Design (7552) specification (AQA)
References & sources