Notes · WelshUK · A-Levels

Oracy / Llafaredd

Llafaredd is examined twice in this qualification, in Unit 1 alongside the film and the play and again in Unit 4 alongside the novel, and between them the two orals carry 35% of the A level — more than any single written paper. Both run identically: an examiner appointed by WJEC visits the centre in the weeks around Easter, candidates are examined in groups of no more than three, a group of three talks for approximately forty-five minutes, and every examination is recorded so that a mark can be checked by relistening. This topic teaches the competence rather than the material: what AO1 actually rewards, what register a first-language candidate should be speaking in, and how three people share forty-five minutes without either dominating or disappearing. The material for each oral is taught in ffilm-a-drama and in y-nofel.

5 sections~35 min reading time4 competenciesLevel Foundation 2 · Standard 2 · Advanced 1

T·0111 / 14

Exam profile

AO1 · Speak the language correctly and proficiently, adopting a context-appropriate linguistic registerAO1 · Listen attentively to others and consider their contributionsAO1 · Develop relevant viewpoints and ideas in a balanced manner, summarise and reach fair conclusionsAO2 · Demonstrate knowledge of specific texts and their background through critical analysis that discusses and evaluates other interpretations

Operators:discussexplainjustifycompareevaluatesummariseresponddevelop

basic level

At AS only Unit 1 is in play, and its oracy element is AO1 5 against AO2 10 — that is, two thirds of the unit is what you KNOW about the film and the play, and one third is how you speak. Get the knowledge secure first, because fluent speech with nothing to say scores badly on a unit weighted like this. Practise in a real group of three from the first term, and record yourselves: the examination is recorded, so getting used to a microphone in the room is free preparation.

higher level

At A level oracy is worth 11.7% and it is the only assessment objective examined solely by speech, so it cannot be recovered elsewhere. Unit 4 raises the AO1 share to 6.7 and makes the discussion SYNOPTIC: you are expected to connect elements of the subject and to refer to works you have read or seen beyond the set texts. That changes what preparation looks like — you need a small stock of read-around texts you can bring in accurately and briefly, not a longer summary of the novel.

Depth

Text

Contents · 5 sections

Oracy / Llafaredd

Where the two orals sit in a six-unit qualification#

FoundationWJEC Welsh (First Language), specification structure — six units, three AS and three A2, unitised, allowing staged assessmentSpecification §4, assessment objective weightings by unit, and §4.4 the uniform mark scaleUnit 1 The Film, the Play and Oracy 15%; Unit 4 The Novel and Oracy 20%

The six units, their weights and their assessment-objective split

Fig. 1The whole qualification on one plate. The emphasised cell is Unit 1's split: five per cent of the A level for how you speak, ten for what you know about the film and the play — the two-to-one ratio that should govern how the oral is prepared.

This qualification is built out of six units, three taken at AS and three at A2, and it is unitised, which means a candidate may sit units in stages rather than in one final block. AS Unit 1, The Film, the Play and Oracy, is worth 15% of the A level; AS Unit 2, the Non-examination Assessment, 10%; AS Unit 3, The Use of Language, and Poetry, 15%; A2 Unit 4, The Novel and Oracy, 20%; A2 Unit 5, Medieval Prose and Early and Medieval Poetry, 20%; and A2 Unit 6, Appreciation of Literature and Welsh Language in Context, 20%. Oracy is not a single component tucked into one of them. It is examined in Unit 1 and again in Unit 4, and those two units together are 35% of the A level, which is more than any written paper carries.

The mark figures in the specification's tables need reading carefully, because they are UNIFORM marks and not raw ones. The maximum uniform marks per unit are 75, 50, 75, 100, 100 and 100, and they total 500: the GCE AS carries 200 uniform marks and the full A level 500. Unit 2 makes the distinction visible — its two folio tasks are worth twenty raw marks each, forty in total, against a uniform maximum of fifty. The uniform mark scale exists so that candidates reaching the same standard receive the same mark whichever series they sat a unit in, and that is exactly what makes staged assessment workable. At A level 400 uniform marks is a grade A and 200 an E; A* additionally requires at least 90% of the A2 uniform marks, which is 270 out of 300.

The assessment objectives are three and they are very unevenly weighted. AO1, use of spoken language, is 11.7% of the A level; AO2, responding to texts, is 50.2%; AO3, using written language, is 38.1%. The declared ranges are wider — AO1 5 to 15%, AO2 45 to 60%, AO3 35 to 50% — but those are the realised figures. Half of this qualification, then, is the disciplined reading of texts, and rather less than an eighth is speech. That is worth knowing before you decide how much of your revision time to spend on the orals, and it is also why a candidate who is a superb talker but a thin reader will not do as well here as their fluency suggests they should.

Where the AO1 marks actually sit is the useful detail. Unit 1 is AO1 5 plus AO2 10, and Unit 4 is AO1 6.7 plus AO2 13.3 — in both cases the AO2 share is double the AO1 share. That arithmetic settles a common misconception about the orals. They are not conversation tests with a book attached; they are examinations of your knowledge of a text, conducted orally, in which how you speak carries a third of the marks and what you know and can argue carries two thirds. A candidate preparing for these examinations should therefore spend roughly twice as long on the film, the play and the novel as on rehearsing fluency — and the fluency work should be done ON that material, never in the abstract.

Worked example

Reading the AO table as a revision plan rather than a fact

You have two years and six units. Using only the per-unit AO weightings, decide where speaking practice belongs in the plan and where it does not.

List where AO1 exists at all
AO1 appears in exactly two places: Unit 1, worth 5% of the A level, and Unit 4, worth 6.7%. Total 11.7%. Nowhere else in the qualification is speech assessed. Unit 2 is AO3 alone; Units 3, 5 and 6 divide between AO2 and AO3. So every minute of speaking practice is bidding for 11.7% of the qualification — a real share, but a bounded one.
Notice what shares the room with AO1
In Unit 1, AO1 5 sits beside AO2 10; in Unit 4, AO1 6.7 sits beside AO2 13.3. The AO2 marks in those two units total 23.3% of the A level, which is twice the whole of AO1. In other words, the two oral units are principally examinations of how well you know the film, the play and the novel. Speaking practice that is not ABOUT those texts is bidding for the smaller half of a small share.
Convert that into a weekly habit
The habit that serves both objectives at once is a weekly recorded discussion of about twenty minutes in a group of three on a single located episode from the current set text — one scene of the film, one exchange from the play, one chapter of the novel. It is preparation for AO2 because it forces you to know the episode; it is preparation for AO1 because it is speech; and it is preparation for the examination itself because the examination is a recorded group discussion of about forty-five minutes.
Decide what NOT to do
Do not spend time on general conversational fluency. You are a first-language speaker sitting a first-language qualification: the examiner is not testing whether you can hold a conversation in Welsh, and no mark is available for demonstrating that you can. What is being tested is whether you can speak CORRECTLY, in a register appropriate to a critical discussion, about texts you know, while listening to two other people and building towards a conclusion. Those are four separate skills and none of them improves by chatting.
Check the plan against the A* condition
A needs grade A overall plus 270 of the 300 A2 uniform marks. The A2 units are 4, 5 and 6. Unit 4 is the second oral. So a candidate aiming at A cannot treat the A2 oral as the easy one: it is 100 of the 300 uniform marks that the 90% condition is measured on. That single fact usually reorders a plan that had put the A2 oral last.

Result: AO1 exists only in Units 1 and 4 and totals 11.7%; the AO2 marks sitting beside it in those units total 23.3%. So the oral units are text examinations conducted in speech. The plan that follows is a weekly recorded twenty-minute group discussion of one located episode, not general conversation practice — and Unit 4, being one of the three A2 units, sits inside the 90% condition for A*.

Typical mistakes

Reading the unit mark table as raw marks and then being confused when Unit 2's two tasks come to forty rather than fifty.
Treating the orals as fluency tests and preparing them by talking rather than by reading.
Assuming a unitised specification means the AS units can be forgotten once they are banked — they still supply 40% of the A level.
Planning for grade A* on aggregate uniform marks alone and missing the separate 90% A2 condition.

Active revision

Write out the six units from memory on one side of a card: title, weight, uniform maximum and AO split. Then answer three questions from the card without looking anything up. Which unit is marked on AO3 alone? Which two units have identical AO structures but inverted proportions? And if you have 400 uniform marks in total, what else must be true before you are awarded A*? If any of the three takes you more than fifteen seconds, the card is not yet learned.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: WJEC GCE AS/A level Welsh (First Language) specification — unit structure, assessment objectives and the uniform mark scale (WJEC CBAC)

How the examination actually runs, and what the examiner is allowed to do#

FoundationUnit 1 and Unit 4 Notes for Teachers — external assessment, examiner visits before and after Easter, examinations recorded, groups of no more than three, approximately 45 minutes for a group of threeThe role of the examiner — stimulate discussion, initiate a change of direction, ask for evidence, ensure each candidate can respondUnit 4 Synoptic Assessment — make connections between elements of the subject and refer to works read or seen

The two oral examinations compared

Fig. 2Identical machinery, different material and one added demand. The emphasised cell is the only substantive difference in what you must do: Unit 4 is synoptic, so the discussion must reach beyond the novel to works you have read or seen.

Both orals are externally assessed, and the arrangements are the same in Unit 1 and Unit 4. An examiner appointed by WJEC visits the centre during the weeks before and after the Easter holidays. Teachers are expected to have assessed candidates internally during the year and the centre's assessment is used to guide the examiner, but the mark is determined by the examiner on the evidence of the examination itself. Every examination is recorded, which means any mark can be checked by relistening. The specification also recommends that candidates sit a full mock examination before the day. Practically, that recommendation is the single most valuable line in the section: the first time you experience a recorded forty-five-minute discussion with a stranger should not be the day the marks are awarded.

Candidates are examined in groups of no more than three. Groups are selected on the basis of candidate ability or at the examiner's discretion, so you may not be able to choose who you sit with. A group of three is examined for approximately forty-five minutes; where a centre has only one candidate, that candidate is examined individually. The forty-five minutes covers the whole unit — in Unit 1 both the film and the play, in Unit 4 the novel. Divide it and you get a rough working figure of about fifteen minutes of speaking per candidate across a group of three, though the examination is a discussion rather than a set of turns and the time will not fall evenly. Knowing the rough figure is what stops a candidate either monopolising the room or waiting politely for a gap that never comes.

The examiner's role is defined narrowly, and reading that definition tells you exactly what to expect. When necessary the examiner will stimulate discussion by asking questions, initiate a change of direction in the discussion, ask a candidate to provide evidence to substantiate ideas or develop an argument, and ensure that each candidate has an opportunity to respond. Three of those four are interventions you can prepare for. If you are asked for evidence, you should have a located episode ready rather than a general impression. If the direction changes, you should be able to leave a topic cleanly rather than finishing your prepared thought. And if the examiner is having to create your opportunity to respond, the group has already gone wrong.

Unit 4 adds one requirement that Unit 1 does not carry: it is a SYNOPTIC assessment. During the discussion candidates should make connections between the different elements of the subject — the specification gives theme analysis, appreciating style and using spoken language as its own examples — and should refer to works they have read or seen as well as the texts they have studied. That is a genuine change in what preparation means. A candidate walking into the Unit 4 oral needs, alongside the novel, a small and accurate stock of other reading: another novel, a poem from the Unit 3 set, a play, a film. Two or three, known properly, are worth more than a list of titles.

Worked example

Answering the examiner's request for evidence without stalling

The examiner interrupts your general point about a character with the specification's own move: a request to substantiate the idea. Build a three-sentence answer that works whatever the text is.

The shape
Three sentences, in this order. Locate: name where in the text you are. Describe: say in your own words what happens there, in one sentence, without retelling the plot around it. Claim: say what that shows, tying it back to the point you were making when you were interrupted. Location, content, claim. It is the same unit of evidence the written papers reward, delivered aloud.
The Welsh that carries it
Have the joins ready so you are not composing them under pressure. To locate: “Mae hynny i'w weld yn gliriaf yn y bennod lle…”. To describe: “Yno, mae…”. To claim: “Sy'n dangos nad…” or “Ac mae hynny'n awgrymu bod…”. Note the mutations in the frame itself: y bennod, not y pennod — pennod is feminine and softens after the article; and yn gliriaf, not yn cliriaf, because predicative yn takes the soft mutation.
What to do if you have not got a located episode
Say so and convert the moment into something useful rather than bluffing: “Alla i ddim rhoi fy mys ar y darn ar hyn o bryd, ond mae'r un peth yn digwydd pan…”. A candidate who admits the gap and then supplies a different, real example has demonstrated exactly the honest handling of evidence AO2 asks for. A candidate who invents a scene has produced an error the examiner can hear, and the recording will confirm it.
Handing over rather than stopping
End the third sentence by turning the point outward: “Ydy hynny'n taro chi yr un ffordd, Elin?” or “Tybed a fyddai rhywun yn dadlau'r gwrthwyneb?”. This does three things at once. It ends your turn on a clean edge rather than a trailing sentence; it gives the examiner no reason to intervene to include somebody else; and it opens the door to the discussion of OTHER INTERPRETATIONS that AO2 explicitly rewards.
Why three sentences and not more
In forty-five minutes shared three ways, a four-minute answer is roughly a quarter of your total airtime spent on one point. Three sentences take about twenty seconds and can be given ten or twelve times in an examination. Ten short, located, claim-bearing contributions demonstrate far more knowledge than two long ones, and they leave room for the listening and the concluding that AO1's second and third bullets ask for.

Result: Locate, describe, claim — three sentences, about twenty seconds — then hand the point outward with a question. Prepared joins (“Mae hynny i'w weld yn gliriaf yn y bennod lle…” · “Sy'n dangos nad…” · “Ydy hynny'n taro chi yr un ffordd?”) mean you are composing the content, not the grammar. If the episode is not there, say so and supply a real alternative rather than inventing one.

Typical mistakes

Preparing a monologue. This is a discussion; a speech delivered into it will be interrupted and will not show the listening AO1 asks for.
Waiting for the examiner to invite you in. If the examiner has to ensure you get an opportunity to respond, that has been noticed.
Bringing a list of other titles to the Unit 4 oral rather than two or three works you can actually say something accurate about.
Finishing a prepared point after the examiner has changed the direction of the discussion.

Active revision

Run a full mock in a group of three with a recorder on the table and a teacher playing examiner from the specification's four permitted moves and nothing else. Then listen back with a stopwatch and measure three things: your total speaking time, the number of times you referred to a located episode rather than a general impression, and the number of times you responded to something another candidate said rather than to the examiner. The third number is the one that most often turns out to be zero.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: WJEC GCE AS/A level Welsh (First Language) specification — Unit 1 and Unit 4 Notes for Teachers, and the role of the examiner (WJEC CBAC)

What AO1 actually rewards, bullet by bullet#

StandardAO1 Use of spoken language, 5–15% of the qualification (realised 11.7%) — three bulletsUnit 1 and Unit 4 marking considerations — correctness and proficiency, appropriate register, specific information about the text and its background, listening attentively, raising questions, developing opinions, interacting, forming conclusions

AO1 has three bullets and they are not equal in the attention candidates give them. The first is to speak the language correctly and proficiently, adopting a context-appropriate linguistic register. The second is to listen attentively to others and consider their contributions. The third is to develop relevant viewpoints and ideas in a balanced manner, summarise and reach fair conclusions. Almost every candidate prepares the first. Rather fewer prepare the second, and it is not simply politeness: considering a contribution means engaging with its substance, which requires you to have understood it well enough to extend, qualify or answer it. Almost nobody prepares the third, and it is the one that separates a good discussion from a strong one, because a conclusion has to be reached by the group and somebody has to reach it.

The specification's own marking note for the two orals expands the objective and is worth reading as a checklist. Consideration is given to the candidate's ability to speak the language correctly and proficiently, using the appropriate register; to demonstrate specific information about the film and the play — or, in Unit 4, the novel — AND THEIR BACKGROUND; and then, listed as a distinct cluster, to listen attentively to others, raise questions, develop opinions, interact and form conclusions. Five verbs in that last cluster, and only one of them, developing opinions, is about you talking. Raising questions, interacting and forming conclusions are all things done WITH the other candidates in the room. This is an examination in which two of your three assessment objectives' worth of behaviour depends on other people.

The phrase 'and their background' in that note does real work. It is what makes reading around the text examinable in the oral. For the film, background means the historical material it draws on, the circumstances of its making and its reception. For the play, it means the dramatist's other work and the moment the play was written into. For the novel, it means the society and period the book portrays where that is relevant, and the author's position in Welsh writing. None of this needs to be extensive. What it needs to be is accurate and brief, deployed in a sentence rather than a paragraph, and attached to a point about the text rather than delivered as a preamble.

There is one thing AO1 conspicuously does NOT reward, and it is worth stating because first-language candidates sometimes assume the opposite. There is no mark for demonstrating that you can speak Welsh. You are a fluent speaker sitting a first-language qualification, and fluency is the floor rather than the achievement. What is assessed is correctness — the mutations, the idiom, the syntax holding up under the pressure of an unrehearsed argument — and appropriateness of register, and the quality of your handling of other people's contributions. A candidate who speaks beautifully for forty-five minutes without once building on what somebody else said has left a third of the objective untouched.

Worked example

Turning a bare agreement into a contribution that scores

Another candidate has just made a reasonable point about a character's motives. You agree. Write four versions of your response, from the one that earns nothing to the one that satisfies all three AO1 bullets.

Version one — the empty agreement
“Ydw, dw i'n cytuno.” This is grammatically fine and worth nothing. It demonstrates neither knowledge of the text nor consideration of the contribution; it is an acknowledgement, not a response. If your transcript is full of these, the listening bullet has not been satisfied — you have heard, which is not the same as considered.
Version two — agreement plus your own point
“Ydw, dw i'n cytuno. Ac mae'r un peth yn wir am y bennod olaf, lle mae…” Better: there is now a located episode and a claim. But structurally it is still two monologues laid end to end. The other candidate's point has been used as a doorway rather than engaged with, and a listener could remove their contribution without changing yours.
Version three — extending their point with evidence
“Mae hynny'n taro deuddeg, ac mi fyddwn i'n mynd gam ymhellach: os ydy'r cymhelliad yna'n wir yn y darn yna, mae'n egluro pam mae'r cymeriad yn ymddwyn fel y mae yn y bennod olaf hefyd.” Now their claim is doing work inside yours. You have considered the contribution, extended it, and supplied a second location where it holds. This satisfies the first two bullets.
Version four — adding the balance and the conclusion
“…Er, mae 'na un lle nad ydy hynny'n dal — pan mae'r cymeriad yn gwneud yn union y gwrthwyneb heb esboniad. Felly efallai mai'r casgliad tecaf ydy bod y cymhelliad yn gyson ond nid yn ddigonol.” The third bullet asks for viewpoints developed in a BALANCED manner and for fair conclusions. Naming the place where your own extension fails, and then formulating what the group can fairly conclude, is that bullet done. Note the mutations: yn ddigonol and yn gyson after predicative yn; nad ydy for the negative relative.
What the four versions cost in time
Version one takes two seconds, version four about twenty. Across forty-five minutes shared three ways you have roughly fifteen minutes of speech. Forty version-fours would overfill it; ten would use about three minutes and would demonstrate the whole objective. The right target is therefore not to talk more but to convert the agreements you were going to make anyway into version threes and fours.

Result: Four escalating responses to the same agreement: the bare “dw i'n cytuno” (worth nothing), agreement plus a separate point (two monologues), extension of their claim with a second located episode (bullets one and two), and extension plus the counter-instance plus a fair conclusion (all three bullets). Roughly ten version-fours fill three minutes and demonstrate the whole of AO1.

Typical mistakes

Preparing content and treating the group as an obstacle to delivering it.
Agreeing pleasantly with everything, which is not the same as considering a contribution.
Front-loading background as an introduction rather than deploying one accurate fact where it does work.
Letting accuracy slip once the discussion becomes genuinely spontaneous — which is precisely where it is being measured.

Active revision

Record a twenty-minute group discussion and then transcribe two minutes of your own speech exactly as you said it, including the false starts. Mark every mutation. Count how many are wrong. Most candidates find between two and five errors in two minutes of unrehearsed speech, and they are almost always in the same three places: the soft mutation on a feminine noun after the article, the object of an inflected verb, and yn before an adjective. Those three, drilled aloud, remove most of what an examiner would hear.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: WJEC GCE AS/A level Welsh (First Language) specification — assessment objectives and the oral marking considerations (WJEC CBAC)

Cofrestr ar lafar: which Welsh to speak in the examination#

StandardAO1 — speak the language correctly and proficiently adopting a CONTEXT-APPROPRIATE linguistic registerSpecification skills statement — use a correct linguistic register in a broad range of contexts, including to discuss literatureKnowledge and understanding — the register and appropriateness of language and style

The objective asks for a CONTEXT-APPROPRIATE register, and the context here is a critical discussion of a literary text with an examiner and two peers. That is not the same as a formal written register and it is emphatically not literary Welsh. Three registers are worth naming and keeping distinct. Cymraeg llenyddol — literary Welsh — carries the inflected verb forms, y mae and nid yw, ni followed by the aspirate mutation; it is what you READ in the medieval material and in much of the twentieth-century prose, and you write it only when a task's register demands it. Cymraeg safonol — standard modern Welsh — is the register of a critical essay, a news bulletin, a press release. Tafodiaith, or Cymraeg llafar, is natural spoken Welsh with its regional forms.

For the two orals the answer is the third with the vocabulary of the second. Speak naturally, in your own dialect, and do not attempt to speak as you would write: an oral answer delivered in Cymraeg llenyddol sounds stilted and, worse, tends to break down under pressure into forms that are neither one thing nor the other. What must be imported from the standard register is the critical vocabulary — cymeriadaeth, trosiad, cywair, naws, adeiladwaith, safbwynt, dyfais lenyddol — and a degree of syntactic control that ordinary conversation does not require. The register you want could be described as an educated person talking seriously about a book to other people who have read it, which is exactly what is happening.

Dialect is a resource and not an error. The north–south lexical split is real and neither side of it is more correct: rŵan and nawr, efo and gyda, allan and mas, i fyny and lan, nain and mam-gu, hogyn and crwt or bachgen. An examiner in Bangor and an examiner in Caerfyrddin will both hear their own forms and neither will penalise the other's. What is penalised is inconsistency for its own sake and, more commonly, the intrusion of English where a Welsh word exists — not the long-established borrowings that are simply part of the language, but the reflexive code-switch that fills a gap in preparation rather than a gap in the language.

What accuracy means in speech is narrower and more testable than candidates expect. Three things carry most of the risk. The mutations, because they are automatic in fluent speech until the sentence becomes complicated, and then they are not. Idiom, because a slightly-off idiom is more audible than a slightly-off word. And the handling of subordinate clauses, particularly reported speech and the negative relative, because those are where a spontaneous sentence most often loses its thread halfway. All three are drillable aloud in a way that vocabulary is not, and all three are audible on a recording, which is why the recording is the most useful revision tool available in this unit.

Worked example

The same claim in three registers, and which one belongs in the oral

Take one straightforward critical claim and write it three ways: in literary Welsh, in standard written Welsh, and in the spoken register the oral wants. Then say what each one costs.

Cymraeg llenyddol
“Nid yw'r awdur yn cyflwyno'r cymeriad hwn heb ryw gymaint o gydymdeimlad, ac fe ellir dadlau mai dyna a bair i'r darllenydd betruso cyn ei gondemnio.” Correct, and it would be at home in a critical essay of an older cast. Spoken aloud in a discussion it sounds like a recitation, and the moment the examiner changes direction you cannot improvise in it — which is where candidates who try this end up producing hybrid forms that are wrong in both registers.
Cymraeg safonol ysgrifenedig
“Nid yw'r awdur yn cyflwyno'r cymeriad heb gydymdeimlad, ac mae hynny'n peri i'r darllenydd oedi cyn ei gondemnio.” This is what you would write in the Unit 5 or Unit 6 essay. It is a register above natural speech, and while it can be spoken it still carries a written cadence. Note ei gondemnio with the soft mutation for the masculine possessive; ei chondemnio would be the feminine, with the aspirate.
The spoken register the oral wants
“Dydy'r awdur ddim yn cyflwyno'r cymeriad yma heb gydymdeimlad, a dyna sy'n gwneud i chi oedi cyn ei gondemnio fo.” Same claim, same critical vocabulary — cyflwyno, cydymdeimlad, condemnio — but the negative is the spoken dydy…ddim rather than nid yw, and the sentence is built the way you actually build sentences. This survives interruption, and it is what the objective's 'context-appropriate' means.
The regional variable is not the point
The final fo is northern; a southern speaker would say ei gondemnio fe, and there is no mark in it either way. What matters is that the register stayed consistent. A sentence that begins Nid yw and ends with fo is the failure mode: it signals a candidate reaching for a formality they do not own, and it is far more audible than any dialect form.
The rule to carry in
Speak your own Welsh; import the critical vocabulary, not the syntax. The examiner is listening for whether a fluent speaker can discuss literature accurately and appropriately, not for whether they can imitate a written text. The one place literary Welsh belongs in the oral is inside a quotation from the set text, where it is the author's register and not yours.

Result: Three registers, one claim. Literary Welsh cannot be improvised in and produces hybrids under pressure; standard written Welsh carries a written cadence; the spoken register — dydy…ddim rather than nid yw, natural sentence-building, standard critical vocabulary imported wholesale — is what the oral wants. Regional forms are free. Mixing registers within a sentence is the audible error.

Typical mistakes

Speaking in written Welsh, which sounds artificial and collapses when the discussion becomes genuinely spontaneous.
Assuming a regional form is a mistake and hypercorrecting into a register you do not own.
Reaching for the English critical term because the Welsh one was never learned — trosiad, cyffelybiaeth, cynghanedd, naws, cywair, adeiladwaith.
Losing the mutation on the object of an inflected verb precisely when the sentence gets long.

Active revision

Build a single card of critical terminology in Welsh and use nothing else in discussion for a fortnight: cymeriadaeth, adeiladwaith, naws, cywair, trosiad, cyffelybiaeth, personoli, eironi, delweddaeth, safbwynt y traethydd, dyfais lenyddol, uchafbwynt. Say each one aloud in a full sentence about your current set text. The purpose is not to learn the words — you know them — but to make them the FIRST thing that arrives when you need them, instead of their English equivalents.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: WJEC GCE AS/A level Welsh (First Language) specification — knowledge, understanding and skills; register and appropriateness (WJEC CBAC)

Exam technique: three people, forty-five minutes#

AdvancedUnit 1 and Unit 4 Notes for Teachers — groups of no more than three, approximately 45 minutes, groups selected on ability or at the examiner's discretionThe role of the examiner — ensure that each candidate has an opportunity to respondAO1 — listen attentively to others and consider their contributions; develop viewpoints in a balanced manner, summarise and reach fair conclusions

The examination is a shared resource and it does not divide itself fairly. Forty-five minutes among three candidates is about fifteen minutes each, but nothing in the room enforces that. In practice a group of three produces one of three patterns: an even distribution, which is rare; a dominant candidate and two who wait; or, most commonly, two candidates who talk and one who is drawn in by the examiner. The last of those is the worst outcome for everybody, because the examiner's intervention to ensure the quiet candidate can respond is itself evidence, and because the two who filled the space have generally filled it with length rather than substance. The remedy is not politeness. It is a habit of taking the floor in short, dense turns and giving it back deliberately.

The single most effective technique is to end your turn by handing it to a named person with a real question. “Beth wyt ti'n feddwl am hynny, Rhys?” costs three seconds. It ends your turn cleanly; it demonstrates the interaction the marking note asks for; it makes the examiner's inclusion move unnecessary; and it means that when Rhys answers, he is answering YOU, which sets up your next contribution as an extension rather than a fresh start. Done four or five times across forty-five minutes it changes the shape of the whole examination, and it is the cheapest mark in the unit. It works even better if the group has agreed in advance that they will all do it, because then nobody has to be generous at their own expense.

Preparation for a group examination should include the group. Agree beforehand — legitimately, since nothing in the specification forbids candidates preparing together — that you will not all bring the same three points. If all three of you have prepared the same reading of the same central character, two of you will have nothing to add. Divide the ground: one takes structure, another characterisation, a third theme and background; or divide by section of the text. Then, in the examination, each of you has something the others need, and the discussion has somewhere to go. This is not collusion; it is the ordinary preparation of a seminar, and it produces exactly the interaction the objective describes.

Finally, somebody has to conclude. AO1's third bullet asks candidates to summarise and reach fair conclusions, and in most groups nobody does, because the examiner changes direction before anyone thinks to. Learn to recognise the moment a strand is exhausted and to close it: “Felly, os ydan ni'n rhoi'r ddwy ddadl at ei gilydd, mae'n edrych fel bod…, hyd yn oed os nad ydan ni'n cytuno pam.” That single sentence does the summarising and the fairness at once — it states what the group has established and marks honestly where it has not agreed. Two of those in a forty-five-minute examination is enough. Nobody else in the room is likely to produce one.

Worked example

A five-move contribution plan, written out in Welsh

Build a plan you can carry into either oral: five moves that between them satisfy all three AO1 bullets, each with the Welsh ready so that you compose content rather than grammar under pressure.

Move one — open with a located claim
Your first substantial contribution should establish that you know the text at close range. “Y peth cyntaf sy'n fy nharo i am y bennod agoriadol ydy…, ac mae hynny'n gosod naws y gweddill.” Note fy nharo: fy takes the nasal mutation, so taro becomes nharo. This is the mutation most often lost in speech and it is in one of the commonest frames in the language.
Move two — extend somebody else's point
“Mae hynny'n taro deuddeg, ac mi fyddwn i'n mynd gam ymhellach — os ydy hynny'n wir, yna mae'n rhaid bod…” The value here is structural: their claim becomes a premise of yours, which is what considering a contribution means. Mi fyddwn takes the soft mutation after mi; gam ymhellach is the adverbial soft mutation of cam.
Move three — disagree with a reason and an example
“Dw i ddim yn siŵr am hynny, achos yn y bennod lle mae…, mae'r gwrthwyneb yn digwydd.” Disagreement is not rudeness in a seminar and the objective explicitly wants balance. What makes it score is that it is reasoned and located: a disagreement with no example attached is an opinion, and an opinion is not evidence of knowledge.
Move four — bring in background, briefly
One sentence, attached to a point, never as a preamble: “Ac o gofio pryd y cafodd hyn ei ysgrifennu, mae'r dewis yna'n fwy beiddgar nag y mae'n ymddangos.” The marking note asks for specific information about the text AND ITS BACKGROUND; one accurate deployed fact demonstrates that better than three minutes of context nobody asked for. In Unit 4 this is also where a synoptic reference to another work you have read belongs.
Move five — summarise and hand over
“Felly, hyd yn hyn, mae'n edrych fel ein bod ni'n cytuno bod…, ond nid ar pam. Elin, wyt ti'n gweld ffordd o gysoni'r ddau esboniad?” This is the third bullet and the interaction requirement in one sentence. Rehearse it until it is automatic, because it is the contribution least likely to occur to you spontaneously and the one most likely to be missing from every other candidate's performance.

Result: Five moves: a located opening claim; an extension of somebody else's point; a reasoned, located disagreement; one sentence of deployed background (or, in Unit 4, one synoptic reference); and a summary that names the agreement and the remaining disagreement before handing to a named candidate. Rehearsed as Welsh frames rather than as content, the plan leaves you free to think about the text while the sentences look after themselves.

Typical mistakes

Speaking at length to prove you have prepared, which consumes airtime you will want later and shows less knowledge than five short located points.
Staying silent out of courtesy until the examiner has to include you.
Arriving with the same prepared reading as the other two candidates.
Never closing a strand, so the discussion simply moves on and no conclusion is ever reached.

Active revision

Run a mock in a group of three with one added rule: every turn must end with a question addressed to a named person, and no turn may last longer than thirty seconds. It will feel artificial for the first ten minutes and then it will not. Afterwards, count the turns. A group of three following that rule typically produces sixty to eighty turns in forty-five minutes instead of the fifteen or twenty an ordinary discussion produces, and every one of them is evidence.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: WJEC GCE AS/A level Welsh (First Language) specification — Unit 1 and Unit 4 oral arrangements and marking considerations (WJEC CBAC)

References & sources

Sources

WJEC CBAC

WJEC GCE AS/A level Welsh (First Language) specification — unit structure, assessment objectives and the uniform mark scale

Oracy / Llafaredd

Key points

Reading the AO table as a revision plan rather than a fact

Key points

Answering the examiner's request for evidence without stalling

Key points

Turning a bare agreement into a contribution that scores

Key points

The same claim in three registers, and which one belongs in the oral

Key points

A five-move contribution plan, written out in Welsh

Sources

Oracy / Llafaredd

Key points

Reading the AO table as a revision plan rather than a fact

Key points

Answering the examiner's request for evidence without stalling

Key points

Turning a bare agreement into a contribution that scores

Key points

The same claim in three registers, and which one belongs in the oral

Key points

A five-move contribution plan, written out in Welsh

Sources