EuraStudy
Notes/Turkish/The independent research: Paper 1 Section C, forty marks and a fifth of the A-Level
Notes · TurkishUK · A-Levels

The independent research: Paper 1 Section C, forty marks and a fifth of the A-Level

In this Edexcel qualification the independent research is not a speaking task — there is no speaking paper — and it is not coursework. It is examined in Paper 1 Section C as a single written question, worth 40 marks, half of Paper 1 and 20 per cent of the whole A-Level, and it is by a wide margin the largest single task in the qualification. The student selects one research subject from the four printed in the specification, researches it independently on one country only, covers all three of its aspects, and then, in the examination and with no dictionary and no documentation of any kind, reads an unseen Turkish text on that subject and responds to a statement about it in approximately 300 to 350 words of Turkish over a recommended hour and twenty-five minutes. The answer is marked by three grids applied to the one piece of writing: knowledge and understanding of society and culture through research, AO4, out of 20; understand and respond to written language, AO2, out of 10; and accuracy and range of language, AO3, out of 10. This topic teaches how to choose, how to research, how to make findings survive an examination with no notes, and how to write the 350 words that satisfy all three grids at once.

5 sections·~31 min reading time·4 competencies·Level Foundation 1 · Standard 2 · Advanced 2

T·121212 / 12
Exam profile
AO4 · Show knowledge and understanding of Turkish society and culture through independent research, and respond critically to itAO2 · Understand an unseen Turkish text and use it to build an argument rather than to summarise itAO3 · Write accurate Turkish with a range of structures across an extended argumentative answerAO2 · Gather evidence independently from authentic Turkish sources and evaluate it
Operators:araştırmakseçmekçözümlemekdeğerlendirmekgerekçelendirmektartışmaksonuç çıkarmakplanlamak

basic level

At first-year standard the expectation is that a research subject has been chosen and its country fixed, that at least two authentic Turkish sources have been found for each aspect, and that the findings can be stated in Turkish without notes.

higher level

The full A-Level expects an answer that argues rather than reports, that uses the unseen text as evidence in the argument rather than summarising it, and that covers all three aspects while sustaining one line of thought.

Depth

Reading depth: In depth

Text

Text size: Standard

Contents · 5 sections▾
  1. The independent research: Paper 1 Section C, forty marks and a fifth of the A-Level
    • 01What Section C is, and the rules that govern it○
    • 02Choosing between the four research subjects◐
    • 03Researching, and making findings survive an examination with no notes◐
    • 04The task in the hall: an unseen text, a statement, and eighty-five minutes●
    • 05Writing the 350 words that satisfy all three grids at once●
§ 01

What Section C is, and the rules that govern it#

●○○FoundationLPPearson Edexcel 9TU0 Paper 1 Section C — Writing (research question)LPPearson Edexcel 9TU0 — Guidance on the independent researchLPDfE GCE AS and A level subject content for modern foreign languages

Key points

Two misconceptions about this task cost candidates marks before they begin, and both come from other qualifications. It is not a speaking task: this Edexcel specification has no speaking paper at all, and a student who has heard about an independent research project in a sister qualification and expects to talk about it has prepared the wrong thing. And it is not coursework: nothing is submitted, nothing is assessed in advance, and no document of any kind may be taken into the examination room. What is assessed is one piece of writing produced under examination conditions, and the research exists solely to make that piece of writing possible.
The mechanics are precise. Independent research means research carried out without the help or instruction of others, including teachers. The student selects only one research subject, from the four printed in the specification, and must base the research on one country only: Turkey for Themes 1, 3 and 4, and either Turkey or Cyprus for Theme 2. All three aspects of the chosen subject must be covered. Evidence must be gathered independently from at least two authentic sources in Turkish, and the specification's list of what counts is wide — newspaper and magazine articles, online written sources, journals, literary texts, films, television, radio, online audio-visual material and interviews. In the examination, the student reads one unseen Turkish text on the subject and responds to a statement about it, using both the text and their own findings, in about 300 to 350 words.
The country rule has consequences in the marking that are worth knowing exactly. If a student writing on Themes 1, 3 or 4 refers to more than one country, examiners will mark content based on Turkey only. If a student writing on Theme 2 refers to more than one, examiners will mark positively, crediting the content based on whichever country gains the higher mark. Either way the words spent on the other country cannot score, and in a 350-word answer that is a serious loss. Note also the specification's own remark that because a Theme 2 researcher works on one country, the unseen text for that theme will be general in nature and equally relevant to both — so it will not supply your country's detail for you.
The teacher's role is bounded and knowing its boundaries protects you. Teachers may give guidance on how to research, including methodology and analytical tools; on the content of the research subjects as printed in the specification; on the availability of resources and time constraints; and on the assessment objectives. Teachers must confirm that your research meets all the aspects, must ensure that no Paper 2 work is used in it, must ensure that a Theme 2 researcher has fixed on one country, and must monitor that students choosing the same subject work independently of one another. Teachers must not teach the content of the research subjects and must not provide sources. The specification twice says that teachers should consider cultural sensitivities when giving guidance on choosing an appropriate subject.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section C: what the three grids are actually measuring

Before choosing a subject, understand what the 40 marks are made of, because it changes what counts as good research.

  1. 01AO4, twenty marks: knowledge and understanding of society and culture, via research

    This grid carries half the marks and it assesses two things together: the content of your answer in relation to the knowledge and understanding of culture and society you have demonstrated, and your ability to analyse critically by sustaining a line of argument and drawing conclusions. Both halves matter. Knowledge without argument bands in the middle; argument without researched knowledge has nothing to argue from. The grid also carries the country rule, so a bilingual answer loses here first.

  2. 02AO2, ten marks: understand and respond to written language

    This grid assesses your understanding of the unseen text through your ability to use relevant information from it to contribute to the ideas, arguments and conclusions you present. Two words in that sentence do the work: use and contribute. An answer that summarises the text has not used it; an answer that ignores the text forfeits ten marks however good its research. The specification prints this grid side by side with AO4 precisely because each is meant to feed the other.

  3. 03AO3, ten marks: accuracy and range of language

    The same grid family as Paper 2's, measuring the variation of your structures and vocabulary and the frequency and impact of your errors. Ten marks is a quarter of the question and it is available to any candidate who writes varied, accurate Turkish, whatever their research found. It is also the part most improved by the last five minutes, which should be spent on verb person, possessive agreement inside nominalisations, and suffix harmony.

  4. 04What that distribution means for how you research

    AO4 is worth twice AO2, which tells you that the emphasis is on your research rather than on the text. So research for arguments, not for facts. A list of institutions and dates is necessary but insufficient; what earns the top AO4 band is knowing what is disputed about your subject, who disputes it and on what evidence. When you read a Turkish source, the note worth making is not only what it says but what it is arguing against — because that is what you will need in the hall.

Result: The distribution — AO4 20, AO2 10, AO3 10 — read as a research instruction: research for arguments and disagreements rather than for facts, plan to use the unseen text rather than to summarise it, and reserve five minutes for the language.

Exam focus

  • Not a speaking task and not coursework. One written question in Paper 1, 40 marks, 20 per cent of the A-Level.
  • One subject, one country, all three aspects, at least two authentic Turkish sources.
  • No dictionary and no research documentation in the examination room.
  • Words about a second country cannot score. Fix the country early and stay in it.

Typical mistakes

  • Preparing to talk about the research, which is assessed nowhere in this qualification.
  • Covering two aspects thoroughly and the third in one sentence, which caps the AO4 mark.
  • Expecting the teacher to supply sources or content. The specification forbids both.
  • Assuming the Theme 2 unseen text will be about your chosen country. It is deliberately general.

Active revision

Write a one-page research contract with yourself: the subject, the country, the three aspects, at least two named Turkish sources for each, the date by which each will be read, and the confirmation that neither of your Paper 2 works bears on it. Then take it to your teacher for the confirmation the specification requires of them.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Turkish (9TU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 02

Choosing between the four research subjects#

●●○StandardLPPearson Edexcel 9TU0 — the four research subjects across the four themes

The four research subjects side by side

Araştırma Konuları: the four choicesTable with 4 columns and 4 rows, Data: Research subject · Theme · Country rule · The three aspects; Türkiye’de eğitim fırsatları · 1 · Turkey only · private and state schools; the education of pupils with disabilities; provision in urban and rural areas; Geleneksel kutlamaların değişmesi · 2 · Turkey or Cyprus, one only · celebrations as they are held today; the effect of modern life on them; their importance in the life of the country; Türkiye’de Turizm · 3 · Turkey only · the effect on the economy; benefits and harms for local people; the investment made to encourage it; Türkiye’deki mülteciler, 2015 sonrası · 4 · Turkey only · the reasons for coming to Turkey; relations between Turks and refugees; assistance from government and other bodiesRESEARCH SUBJECTTHEMECOUNTRY RULETHE THREE ASPECTSTürkiye’de eğitim fırsatları1Turkey onlyprivate and state schools;the education of pupils withdisabilities; provision inurban and rural areasGeleneksel kutlamalarındeğişmesi2Turkey or Cyprus, one onlycelebrations as they areheld today; the effect ofmodern life on them; theirimportance in the life ofthe countryTürkiye’de Turizm3Turkey onlythe effect on the economy;benefits and harms for localpeople; the investment madeto encourage itTürkiye’deki mülteciler,2015 sonrası4Turkey onlythe reasons for coming toTurkey; relations betweenTurks and refugees;assistance from governmentand other bodies
Fig. 1All four subjects with their theme, the country rule that governs them, and their three aspects as the specification prints them. The country column is the one to read first: three of the four are Turkey only, and only the Theme 2 subject offers a choice, which must be made once and held throughout the answer. The aspect column is what your research plan has to satisfy — all three, for the one subject you choose, and the commonest way to cap an AO4 mark is to cover two thoroughly and the third in a sentence. Note the shape of the aspects: in every subject one aspect is descriptive, one is causal or evaluative, and one is institutional. That pattern is a gift, because it tells you what kind of source each aspect needs before you start looking.

Key points

The four research subjects are Türkiye’de eğitim fırsatları from Theme 1, Geleneksel kutlamaların Türkiye’de veya Kıbrıs’ta değişmesi from Theme 2, Türkiye’de Turizm from Theme 3, and 2015’ten beri Türkiye’deki mülteciler from Theme 4. Each is divided into three aspects and all three must be covered. Three of the four are Turkey only; only the Theme 2 subject offers a choice of country, and that choice is between Turkey and Cyprus and must be made once and kept. The specification recommends deciding as early as possible in the academic year, and it is right: a subject chosen in February leaves no time to find the disagreements that the AO4 grid rewards.
Choose on three criteria and not on which subject sounds most interesting. First, source availability in Turkish: can you actually find two authentic Turkish sources for each of the three aspects, and are they at a level you can read? Turizm and mülteciler are both abundantly documented in Turkish; eğitim fırsatları has excellent institutional material but the disability aspect requires care with terminology; geleneksel kutlamalar has the widest range and the least standardisation. Second, aspect balance: is one of the three aspects going to be much harder to cover than the others, because that aspect will cap your AO4 mark. Third, whether the subject is one you can argue about rather than describe.
One further constraint applies to all four and should be checked before anything else: the research must not relate to, or make reference to, either of the works you are studying for Paper 2. On the 9TU0 list there is no automatic collision — no research subject names a prescribed work and no prescribed work is the subject of a research subject, so studying any of the three texts or three films does not close any of the four subjects. But the rule bites on evidence rather than on topic: a work you have studied may not be cited as a source. If your subject is geleneksel kutlamalar and one of your Paper 2 works depicts a celebration, or if your subject is mülteciler and one of them concerns displacement, then that work is unavailable to you as evidence and the temptation to reach for it will be real. Fix works and subject together, early, and let your teacher confirm the pairing.
A note on cultural sensitivity, because the specification raises it twice and it is worth taking seriously rather than as boilerplate. Two of these four subjects concern people who may be in your class or in your family — the education of disabled pupils, and refugees. The way to handle that is not to avoid them but to write about them as the specification's own aspects ask: institutions, provision, relations and assistance, with people as people rather than as a category, with contested assessments attributed to whoever makes them, and with no invented numbers. A well-researched answer on either subject is entirely achievable and often stronger than a safe one on tourism, precisely because there is more to argue about.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section C: testing a subject against its three aspects before committing

You are drawn to Türkiye’de Turizm. Test it properly before committing a year to it.

  1. 01Aspect one, the economy: what would count as evidence and can you get it

    The claim you will need to make is about magnitude and distribution, and the evidence is a published series with a name and a year. The ministry and TÜİK both publish; sector associations publish; provincial chambers of commerce publish. Test: can you find one such source, in Turkish, and read a page of it? If yes, the aspect is workable. If the answer is that you would use a general English-language encyclopaedia entry, the aspect is not yet workable and the subject is not yet chosen.

  2. 02Aspect two, benefits and harms for local people: can you get to one place

    This aspect fails when it is answered in general terms, because in general terms both lists are obvious. It succeeds when it is answered about one named locality, where a specific argument between specific interests can be described. Test: can you find provincial newspaper reporting, or municipal documents, or a documentary, about one coastal or one Cappadocian district? If yes, this is where your best AO4 material will come from.

  3. 03Aspect three, investment to encourage tourism: is there a legal and institutional spine

    There is: the Turizmi Teşvik Kanunu of 1982, the designation of culture and tourism conservation and development regions under it, the ministry's own announcements, and the promotion agency established in 2019. Test: can you name the statute and find one ministry document? This aspect is the one most candidates neglect and therefore the one where a prepared candidate gains most, because it converts a general essay about tourism into an argument about policy.

  4. 04Now decide, and write the decision down

    If all three tests pass, the subject is chosen; write down the country, Turkey, and the three aspects, and check that neither Paper 2 work bears on it. If one test fails, run the same three tests on another subject before committing. The whole exercise takes three hours and it is the highest-return three hours in the entire A-Level, because 20 per cent of the qualification rests on the subject you pick in them.

Result: A three-test protocol applied to one subject: a named published series for the economic aspect, one named locality with accessible local sources for the human aspect, and the 1982 statute plus one ministry document for the policy aspect. Pass all three and commit; fail one and test another subject.

Exam focus

  • Four subjects; three are Turkey only; only the Theme 2 subject offers a choice, between Turkey and Cyprus.
  • Choose on source availability, aspect balance, and whether you can argue about it.
  • No research subject is automatically closed by any prescribed work, but a studied work cannot be a source.
  • The specification asks twice for cultural sensitivity in choosing. Take it as a method, not a prohibition.

Typical mistakes

  • Choosing the subject that sounds most interesting and discovering in March that one aspect has no accessible sources.
  • Deciding late, which leaves time to gather facts but not to find disagreements.
  • Choosing a subject that pulls towards a Paper 2 work as evidence.
  • Avoiding a subject because it is sensitive, rather than learning the method for handling it.

Active revision

For each of the four subjects, spend one hour looking for Turkish sources on each of its three aspects, and record what you found. Then choose on the evidence of that search rather than on preference, and write one paragraph justifying the choice against the three criteria in this section.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Turkish (9TU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 03

Researching, and making findings survive an examination with no notes#

●●○StandardLPPearson Edexcel 9TU0 — Guidance on the independent research

Key points

The specification's list of authentic sources is wide and using its full range is itself evidence of research: newspaper and magazine articles, online written sources, journals, literary texts, films, television, radio, online audio-visual material and interviews. Two are the minimum but two is a poor target. A better one is two per aspect, from at least two different kinds — a ministry document and a provincial newspaper report say quite different things about the same policy, and an answer that can set one against the other is doing something an answer built from a single kind of source cannot. Record for every source: what kind it is, who produced it, what date it carries, and what it argues.
That last item is the one candidates omit and it is the one that matters most. The AO4 grid rewards critical analysis, sustaining a line of argument and drawing conclusions, and you cannot do that from a pile of facts. So read for disagreement. When a Turkish source makes a claim, ask what it is arguing against, who would dispute it, and on what grounds — and write that down beside the claim. Six disagreements, properly understood, are worth more in the examination than sixty facts, because a statement you have never seen before can be attacked or defended from a disagreement you understand, and cannot be from a fact you happen to know.
Nothing may be taken into the examination, so the findings have to be in your head, and the way to get them there is to compress. Build, for each aspect, a card of no more than eight lines containing: three institutions or statutes with dates, two named examples, one disagreement with both sides, and one sentence of your own judgement. Three cards, twenty-four lines, is the whole of your research in a form you can recall. Write the cards in Turkish, because Turkish is the language you will write the answer in, and rewrite them from memory once a week from March; the rewriting, not the reading, is what makes them stick.
Two disciplines protect the answer's honesty and both are worth building into the research from the start. Do not record a number you cannot source: write the publisher and the year beside every figure, and if you cannot, record the direction of the change and who reports it instead. And do not record a quotation you have not read: an attributed paraphrase — a ministry announcement stated that, a columnist argued that — is fully creditable and carries no risk, whereas an invented quotation is both unusable and damaging. These are not restrictions on ambition; they are what makes an ambitious answer safe to write.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section C: turning a Turkish source into a usable card entry

You have read a Turkish newspaper report on your subject. Convert it into card material rather than into notes.

  1. 01Record what the source is, before what it says

    Kaynak: ulusal bir gazetenin haber-analiz yazısı, tarih belirtilmiş. Type, producer and date, in three words. This matters because in the answer you will write according to a report published in a national newspaper rather than according to a source, and the first is creditable evidence of research while the second is not. If a source has no date, record that too — an undated source is a weaker source and knowing so is itself a research skill.

  2. 02Record the claim and, immediately, what it is arguing against

    İddia: uygulamanın yaygınlaştığı. Karşı çıktığı görüş: uygulamanın yalnızca birkaç ilde kaldığı. Two lines instead of one, and the second is what will let you handle an unseen statement. A candidate who has recorded only the claim can agree with it; a candidate who has recorded the disagreement can place any statement the examiner writes somewhere on a spectrum they already understand.

  3. 03Record any number with its source, or convert it to a direction

    If the report gives a figure and names its origin — bakanlık verilerine göre — record both together and use both together. If it gives a figure with no origin, do not record the figure; record artış yönünde, in the direction of increase, and the fact that this source did not say where its number came from. That second observation is usable in the examination as a critical remark about evidence, which is worth more than the number would have been.

  4. 04Compress to one card line, in Turkish

    Ulusal gazete haber-analizi: uygulamanın yaygınlaştığını, bakanlık verilerine dayanarak savunuyor; buna karşılık yerel kaynaklar birkaç ille sınırlı kaldığını belirtiyor. One line, and it contains the source type, the claim, the evidence base, and the counter-position. Eight such lines per aspect is a complete research file that fits in your head, and each one is very nearly a sentence of the answer already.

Result: Card line in Turkish: Ulusal gazete haber-analizi: uygulamanın yaygınlaştığını, bakanlık verilerine dayanarak savunuyor; buna karşılık yerel kaynaklar birkaç ille sınırlı kaldığını belirtiyor.

Exam focus

  • Two authentic Turkish sources is the minimum. Two per aspect, of different kinds, is the target.
  • Read for disagreement, not for facts. Six understood disagreements beat sixty facts.
  • Compress each aspect to an eight-line card in Turkish and rewrite it weekly from memory.
  • Source every number or record the direction instead. Never record a quotation you have not read.

Typical mistakes

  • Gathering facts without ever asking what any of the sources is arguing against.
  • Making notes in English and having to translate them under examination pressure.
  • Relying on English-language summaries of Turkish material, which the task is designed to prevent.
  • Memorising figures without their sources and being unable to use them safely.

Active revision

Build the three eight-line cards in Turkish for your chosen subject. Then, without looking at them, write out all three from memory, and check what you lost. Repeat weekly until nothing is lost, and then keep going once a fortnight until the examination.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Turkish (9TU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 04

The task in the hall: an unseen text, a statement, and eighty-five minutes#

●●●AdvancedLPPearson Edexcel 9TU0 Paper 1 Section C — one unseen text and a statement on the research subject

Key points

The task has two inputs and one output. The inputs are an unseen Turkish text on your research subject and a statement based on that subject, to which you respond; the output is 300 to 350 words of Turkish in a recommended hour and twenty-five minutes. Both inputs must be used: the specification says students must use information from the unseen text and their research findings in their response, and the AO2 grid exists precisely to reward the first while the AO4 grid rewards the second. An answer built only from research forfeits ten marks; an answer built only from the text forfeits far more, because AO4 is worth twenty.
A workable allocation of the eighty-five minutes is fifteen minutes on the text and the statement together, fifteen on planning, forty-five writing and ten checking. Fifteen minutes on a text you have not seen sounds extravagant and is not: this is the only text in the paper you will build an argument from rather than answer questions about, and the reading has to be active. Mark every position and its holder, every turn, every hedge, and every point where the text touches one of your three aspects. By the end of that quarter of an hour you should be able to say in one sentence what the text argues and where it is weakest.
The statement is the thing to be answered and it should be dismantled before anything is written. Statements in this task tend to contain one of a small number of attackable features: an absolute — yalnızca, her zaman, tamamen; a causal claim that could be reversed or qualified; a presupposition, a thing taken for granted that need not be granted; or an evaluative word whose meaning is itself disputed, such as yeterli, başarılı, kalıcı or önemli. Identify which you have, and your opening writes itself. Note also that ne ölçüde katılıyorsunuz-type framings ask for a degree, and an answer that returns a yes or a no has answered a different question.
The planning quarter-hour should produce four things and no more: the position you will take, expressed as a degree; three paragraph claims, each attached to one of your three aspects, in the order you will make them; the point at which the unseen text will be used, and how — as support, as a foil, or as evidence you will qualify; and the concession. Write the plan in Turkish. Then write, and do not deviate: a 350-word answer has no room for a fourth idea, and the commonest cause of an unfinished Section C is a candidate following a thought that was not in the plan.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section C: dismantling four statements of the four kinds

Practise the opening move on four statement types, using Türkiye’de eğitim fırsatları as the subject.

  1. 01The absolute: Türkiye’de eğitim fırsatları yalnızca yaşanılan yere bağlıdır

    Yalnızca is the attackable word, and a single counter-factor defeats it. Opening move: İfadedeki yalnızca sözcüğü fazla kesindir; coğrafya belirleyici bir etkendir, ancak tek etken değildir. Then the three aspects supply the other factors. Note that you are not disagreeing with the observation, only with its exclusivity, which is a stronger and more defensible position than wholesale disagreement.

  2. 02The causal claim: Özel okulların yaygınlaşması, devlet okullarının kalitesini düşürmüştür

    A causal claim can be attacked on direction, on mechanism or on evidence. Opening move: Bu iki gelişme aynı dönemde gerçekleşmiştir; ancak birinin diğerine yol açtığını göstermek için, aradaki mekanizmanın da gösterilmesi gerekir. Naming that correlation is not causation, in Turkish and without the cliché, is a strong opening and it obliges you to supply or deny a mechanism, which is real argument.

  3. 03The presupposition: Engelli öğrencilerin kaynaştırma eğitimine geçişi sorunu çözmüştür

    The presupposition is that there was a single problem and that it is the kind of thing that gets solved. Opening move: İfade, tek bir sorunun varlığını varsaymaktadır. Oysa kaynaştırma, erişim sorununu azaltırken destek personeli ve sınıf mevcudu konusunda yeni sorunlar doğurmuştur. Naming the presupposition and then replacing one problem with two is a move that generates the rest of the paragraph automatically.

  4. 04The disputed evaluative word: Taşımalı eğitim başarılı bir çözümdür

    Başarılı by what measure? Opening move: Başarı ölçütü belirtilmediği sürece bu ifade sınanamaz: okullaşma oranı ölçüt alınırsa uygulama başarılıdır, devamsızlık ve yol süresi ölçüt alınırsa değildir. Making the criterion explicit and then giving two criteria with opposite verdicts is the single most reliable opening for an evaluative statement, and it demonstrates critical analysis in the first two sentences.

Result: Four opening moves, one per statement type: contest the absolute, demand the mechanism, name the presupposition, and make the criterion explicit. Each one converts a statement into a question the answer can argue.

Exam focus

  • Both inputs must be used. The text feeds AO2 out of 10; the research feeds AO4 out of 20.
  • Fifteen minutes reading, fifteen planning, forty-five writing, ten checking.
  • Dismantle the statement: look for an absolute, a causal claim, a presupposition or a disputed evaluative word.
  • A ne ölçüde question wants a degree. A yes or a no has answered a different question.

Typical mistakes

  • Starting to write at minute five and running out of argument at minute forty.
  • Summarising the unseen text in the first paragraph, which uses AO2's material without earning AO2's marks.
  • Answering the topic the statement mentions instead of the claim the statement makes.
  • Following an idea that was not in the plan and leaving the third aspect uncovered.

Active revision

Write four Section C answers to time, to four different statements on your subject, and for each one record what kind of statement it was — absolute, causal, presuppositional or evaluative — and how you attacked it. Four is enough to make the dismantling automatic.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Turkish (9TU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

§ 05

Writing the 350 words that satisfy all three grids at once#

●●●AdvancedLPPearson Edexcel 9TU0 Paper 1 Section C — three mark grids applied to one answer

Key points

The architecture that fits 300 to 350 words and satisfies three grids simultaneously is fixed, and it is worth practising until it is automatic. An opening of about fifty words that dismantles the statement and states a degree. Three body paragraphs of about eighty words, each attached to one of the three aspects, each containing at least one researched specific — an institution, a statute, a named place, a dated event — and each ending on a claim. A close of about forty words that answers the statement in its own vocabulary. That is 330 words. The unseen text is used inside the body paragraphs, not summarised in a paragraph of its own.
Using the text is a technique rather than a gesture, and there are three good ways to do it. As support: Metinde de belirtildiği gibi ..., as is also stated in the text, when the text confirms something your research found. As a foil: Metin, sorunu bir kaynak sorunu olarak sunuyor; oysa araştırmam sırasında incelediğim yerel kaynaklar, sorunun dağıtımla ilgili olduğunu gösteriyordu — where the text and your findings differ, which is the most productive relationship of all. Or as evidence you qualify: Metnin dayandığı veri tek bir ile aittir; bu nedenle sonucu ülke geneline yaymak güçtür. All three are creditable in AO2; only the first is available to a candidate who has not researched.
The AO3 range mark should be pursued deliberately, using the same checklist as Paper 2: a conditional, a passive, a past perfect or future perfect, a nominalised clause with its subject in the genitive, an extended sentence carrying an abstract argument, and varied expression rather than repeated vocabulary. In an argumentative answer these arise naturally if you write arguments rather than lists, and a useful self-test after drafting is to look for any two consecutive sentences with the same structure. There is also a subject-specific dividend: the vocabulary of your research subject is itself range, and using kaynaştırma eğitimi or teşvik belgesi or geçici koruma correctly does more for the grid than any general adjective.
The last ten minutes belong to accuracy and should be spent in three passes, not one. Pass one, verb person: read only the verbs. Pass two, possessive agreement: every -DIk, -(y)AcAk and -mA nominalisation has a possessive that must agree with its own subject, and that subject must be in the genitive. Pass three, harmony and the small marks: suffix vowels, the apostrophe before a suffix on a proper noun, the circumflex in hâlâ, kâğıt, imkân and nikâh, and the dotted and dotless i throughout. Ten minutes, three passes, ten marks. It is the most reliable return anywhere in this paper and it is the first thing a candidate abandons under time pressure, which is exactly why the plan must protect it.
Worked example

Paper 1 Section C: a complete answer skeleton with its three grids audited

Subject: Türkiye’de eğitim fırsatları. Statement: Taşımalı eğitim başarılı bir çözümdür. Build the whole answer.

  1. 01Opening, about fifty words: make the criterion explicit and state a degree

    Başarı ölçütü belirtilmediği sürece bu ifade sınanamaz. Okullaşma oranı ölçüt alınırsa taşımalı eğitim başarılıdır; devamsızlık, yol süresi ve öğrencinin okula aidiyeti ölçüt alınırsa aynı sonuca varmak güçtür. Bu nedenle ifadeye kısmen katılıyorum ve aşağıda üç açıdan gerekçelendireceğim. Fifty-one words. It refuses the question as put, supplies two criteria with opposite verdicts, states a degree and announces three parts.

  2. 02Paragraph one, the rural aspect, using the text as a foil

    Taşımalı eğitim, köy okullarının kapanmasından sonra erişimi büyük ölçüde sağlamıştır ve bu, yadsınamaz bir kazanımdır. Metin de bu noktayı vurgulamaktadır. Ancak metnin dayandığı gözlem tek bir ile aittir; araştırmam sırasında incelediğim iki farklı ildeki yerel haberler, yol süresinin ve kış koşullarının devamsızlığı belirgin biçimde artırdığını gösteriyordu. The text is used twice — once as agreement, once as a limitation of its scope — which is exactly what the AO2 grid rewards.

  3. 03Paragraphs two and three, the other aspects, each with a researched specific

    Paragraph two moves to the private-and-state aspect and argues that transport policy and school-choice policy interact; paragraph three moves to provision for pupils with special educational needs and argues that a bussed system multiplies the distance to a rehberlik ve araştırma merkezi as well as to a school. Each paragraph carries one institution or statute, one named kind of place and one claim, and each ends on the claim rather than on the evidence.

  4. 04Close, then audit all three grids

    Sonuç olarak, taşımalı eğitim bir erişim çözümüdür, bir eğitim çözümü değildir; başarısı hangi soruyu sorduğumuza bağlıdır. AO4: three aspects covered, an argument sustained, a conclusion that follows, and a qualified judgement — no single-country problem since the subject is Turkey only. AO2: the text used twice and qualified once, not summarised. AO3: conditionals, passives, nominalisations, technical vocabulary, and now ten minutes of the three checking passes. That is a 40-mark answer's full anatomy in 330 words.

Result: Opening: Başarı ölçütü belirtilmediği sürece bu ifade sınanamaz. Okullaşma oranı ölçüt alınırsa taşımalı eğitim başarılıdır; devamsızlık, yol süresi ve öğrencinin okula aidiyeti ölçüt alınırsa aynı sonuca varmak güçtür. Close: Taşımalı eğitim bir erişim çözümüdür, bir eğitim çözümü değildir; başarısı hangi soruyu sorduğumuza bağlıdır.

Exam focus

  • Fifty-word opening, three eighty-word paragraphs each on one aspect, forty-word close. About 330 words.
  • Use the unseen text inside the paragraphs — as support, as a foil, or as evidence you qualify.
  • Your subject's own technical vocabulary counts as AO3 range. Use it precisely.
  • Three checking passes: verb person, possessive agreement, then harmony and diacritics.

Typical mistakes

  • Summarising the unseen text in a paragraph of its own, which spends AO2's material without earning its marks.
  • Covering aspects one and two in three paragraphs and aspect three not at all.
  • Writing to 500 words and running out of time before the checking passes.
  • Abandoning the check because the argument feels unfinished. Ten marks say otherwise.

Active revision

Write six Section C answers to time across the year, on six different statements, and for each record the word count of every section, whether all three aspects appeared, how the unseen text was used, and what each of the three checking passes caught. By the sixth, the architecture should require no thought and the checking should be a reflex.

Active recall

Recall the key points — then reveal.

Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Turkish (9TU0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)

Contents

Section -- / 05

    • 01What Section C is, and the rules that govern it○
    • 02Choosing between the four research subjects◐
    • 03Researching, and making findings survive an examination with no notes◐
    • 04The task in the hall: an unseen text, a statement, and eighty-five minutes●
    • 05Writing the 350 words that satisfy all three grids at once●

0/5 Read

From notes into training

The independent research: Paper 1 Section C, forty marks and a fifth of the A-Level

Reinforce this topic with matching tasks from the question bank.

~31
min
4
Competencies
Practise

References & sources

Sources

Pearson Edexcel

  • Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Turkish (9TU0) specification

Previous topic

The prescribed films: Paper 2 Section C, and writing about cinema in Turkish

EuraStudy·Notes T·12·MMXXVI

Last topic of this subject — back to the subject overview.