EuraStudy
This topic carries Paper 3, the only paper in 9AA0 that assesses listening and the paper that carries the whole of the qualification's AO1 weighting. Paper 3 runs 2 hours 15 minutes for 60 marks and 30 per cent: Section A is listening comprehension for 30 marks over four questions in a recommended 45 minutes, including questions that test summary skills, on a recording of male and female speakers using standard spoken Arabic; Section B is a 30-mark question in which a recording and a written text on the same sub-theme are summarised and then evaluated. The single most important practical fact about the paper is that each student has individual control of the recording and may stop, revisit and replay sections of it as they wish — which turns listening from an anxious one-shot task into a method with passes. The topic also does what a course in Arabic must do and few textbooks do explicitly: it is accurate about diglossia, naming Modern Standard Arabic as the assessed written variety, explaining what the specification's own phrase standard spoken Arabic means, and describing the spoken varieties accurately rather than dismissively.
5 sections~36 min reading time3 competenciesLevel Standard 2 · Advanced 3
basic level
At first-year standard the expectation is reliable retrieval: catching the main idea, the speaker's topic, obvious detail, and clearly signalled numbers and dates, and writing short accurate answers in Arabic.
higher level
The full A-Level expects inference and stance. What is the speaker's position, and how do you know? Where do two speakers disagree? What does a hedge or a concession tell you? Answers must summarise without lifting, must preserve quantifiers and attributions exactly, and must be written in accurate Arabic, because Section B's evaluation is marked for accuracy and range as well as for comprehension.
Reading depth: In depth
Text size: Standard
Which Arabic is used where, and which one is assessed
You have spent months learning that an indefinite object ends in -an and a genitive in -in. You listen to a formal Arabic interview and hear almost none of them. Work out what is happening, and what you should be listening for instead.
Arabic drops final short vowels and tanwin when a speaker pauses. At the end of a phrase or sentence, the -u of a nominative, the -i of a genitive and the tanwin -un and -in simply are not pronounced: al-baytu kabirun is heard as al-bayt kabir. So the endings you learned are real, obligatory in writing, and largely inaudible at exactly the point where a learner is listening hardest. This is not sloppiness; it is a rule of the classical language and it applies in the most formal recitation.
The accusative tanwin -an is the exception, because it is written with an alif and the alif is pronounced as a long -a in pause: shukran, ahlan, jiddan, ayḍan, and any indefinite accusative object at the end of a phrase. That is why so many of the Arabic words an English speaker already knows end in -an — they are adverbial accusatives. In listening, a final long -a on an indefinite noun is a reliable signal that you have just heard an object or an adverbial, and that is genuinely useful information about the sentence's structure.
A word ending in ة is pronounced -a in pause and -at when a vowel follows: madrasa on its own, madrasatu al-atfal in a construct. So in connected speech you will hear the -at appear and disappear, and its appearance tells you that the noun is not at the end of its phrase — very often that it heads a construct chain. Hearing madrasat and knowing that a genitive must be coming is a real, usable prediction.
The endings that are always audible are the ones written with letters rather than vowels: the dual ان against ين, and the sound masculine plural ون against ين. مدرسون and مدرسين sound completely different, and the difference tells you whether the noun is a subject or an object. Likewise the ن on an imperfect plural verb — يكتبون against أن يكتبوا — is audible and tells you the mood. Those are the case signals worth training your ear on, because they survive.
In writing, كتب active and كتب passive are identical. In speech they are not: kataba against kutiba, yaktubu against yuktabu. So the one grammatical distinction that reading cannot show you is precisely the one listening can. When a speaker says a verb whose first vowel is u, you have heard a passive, and you should expect no agent. This is the reason a student who listens regularly reads Arabic better, and it is worth saying to yourself the first time you notice it happen.
Three things to listen for, in order of value: the plural and dual endings, because they carry case and are unmissable; the u-vowel that marks a passive; and the -at of a tāʾ marbūṭa in connected speech, because it predicts a construct chain. Everything else in the case system is doing its work silently. Knowing which signals survive means you stop straining for the ones that do not, and that alone measurably improves what you catch.
Result: Final short vowels and tanwin are dropped in pause, so most case endings are inaudible; the accusative -an survives as a long -a because it is written with an alif; the tāʾ marbūṭa surfaces as -at in connected speech and predicts a construct chain; the dual, the sound masculine plural and the verbal ن are always audible and carry case and mood; and the passive, invisible in writing, is clearly audible in its vowels.
Typical mistakes
Active revision
استمع إلى نشرة أخبار عربية قصيرة، ثم إلى مقابلة رسمية، ثم إلى برنامج وثائقي، كل واحد ثلاث دقائق. اكتب بعد كل تسجيل ثلاثة أسطر: ما موضوعه، وما مستوى اللغة فيه، وما الكلمات التي لم تسمعها من قبل. كرر هذا ثلاث مرات في الأسبوع
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Arabic (9AA0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)
This is a transcript of a Section A style extract. Identify the text type, the guest's position, and the exact words that signal it. المذيع: نبدأ حلقتنا اليوم بموضوع يشغل كثيرا من الأسر: وقت الشاشة عند الأطفال. معنا في الاستوديو باحثة في علم النفس التربوي. دكتورة، هل المشكلة في المدة أم في المحتوى؟ الباحثة: شكرا لك. في رأيي أن الحديث عن المدة وحدها يبسط المسألة أكثر مما ينبغي. فالطفل الذي يقضي ساعة في تطبيق تعليمي ليس كالطفل الذي يقضي الساعة نفسها في تصفح غير موجه. غير أنني لا أنكر أن المدة الطويلة تزاحم النوم والحركة، وهذا ثابت في الدراسات
نبدأ حلقتنا اليوم بـ … معنا في الاستوديو is unmistakably a studio interview, and the consequence is immediate: the interviewer's question is the map. هل المشكلة في المدة أم في المحتوى tells you that the next answer will be about duration against content and about nothing else, so you know what you are listening for before the guest speaks. Note أم rather than أو: this is a genuine either-or question, and the guest is being asked to choose.
في رأيي أن … signals an opinion is coming, and يبسط المسألة أكثر مما ينبغي — oversimplifies the matter more than it should — signals that the opinion is a rejection of the question's framing. So the guest's actual answer to هل … أم … is neither: she is declining the choice. Candidates who listen for a noun miss this entirely, because the position is carried by a verb and a comparative, not by a topic word.
فالطفل الذي يقضي ساعة في تطبيق تعليمي ليس كالطفل الذي يقضي الساعة نفسها في تصفح غير موجه. ليس كـ is is not like, and the two relative clauses are deliberately parallel — same verb, same duration, different activity — so that the only variable left is content. That is a controlled comparison, and it is her evidence. An answer to لماذا ترى الباحثة أن المدة وحدها لا تكفي؟ should reproduce the comparison, not the conclusion.
غير أنني introduces a reservation and لا أنكر أن, I do not deny that, marks what follows as something she is conceding to the other side. So تزاحم المدة الطويلة النوم والحركة is not her position; it is what she is granting. A summary that lists it as one of her two arguments has misread the structure. The verb زاحم, to crowd out, is worth learning; it is precise and it appears constantly in writing about time use.
ثابت, established, marks that claim as documented rather than personal — she has just distinguished her opinion, marked في رأيي, from a finding, marked ثابت في الدراسات. That distinction is exactly what the AO1 grid rewards understanding, and it is available in four words. If a question asks أي جزء من كلام الباحثة رأي وأي جزء نتيجة بحثية, the answer is already signposted in the transcript.
ترى الباحثة أن التركيز على المدة وحدها تبسيط، وتدلل على ذلك بالمقارنة بين طفلين يقضيان الوقت نفسه في نشاطين مختلفين. وتقر في الوقت نفسه بأن المدة الطويلة تزاحم النوم والحركة، وتصف هذا الأخير بأنه ثابت في الدراسات لا مجرد رأي. Note تقر بأن for concedes, and وتصف هذا الأخير بأنه, which keeps her own distinction between opinion and finding intact. That distinction is the answer.
Result: ترى الباحثة أن التركيز على المدة وحدها تبسيط، وتدلل على ذلك بالمقارنة بين طفلين يقضيان الوقت نفسه في نشاطين مختلفين. وتقر في الوقت نفسه بأن المدة الطويلة تزاحم النوم والحركة، وتصف هذا الأخير بأنه ثابت في الدراسات لا مجرد رأي
Typical mistakes
Active revision
استمع إلى مقابلة عربية رسمية مدتها ثلاث دقائق. اكتب بالعربية ثلاث جمل: واحدة عن موضوع المقابلة، وواحدة عن موقف الضيف مع ذكر العبارة التي دلت عليه، وواحدة عن رأي نقله الضيف عن غيره. ثم أعد الاستماع للتحقق من أنك لم تحول «بعض» إلى «كل»
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
A Section A recording is a short report on public transport in a large Arab city. Two of its questions are: (1) multiple choice — ما السبب الرئيسي الذي يذكره التقرير لازدحام المرور؟ with four options; and (2) open response — اذكر إجراءين اتخذتهما البلدية، وقيّم أثر أحدهما كما يعرضه التقرير. Work both with the method.
Question 1 asks for السبب الرئيسي, the main reason, not a reason — so the recording will very probably mention several and mark one as principal, and the marker word will be something like الأهم, في المقام الأول, or يعود أساسا إلى. Question 2 asks for exactly two measures and then an evaluation of one of them كما يعرضه التقرير, as the report presents it — which means your own opinion earns nothing here. Both questions are now listening instructions rather than questions.
You establish: one narrator, no interview; the structure is problem, then causes, then measures, then an assessment. That is a report, and reports put their evaluation at the end — so question 2's second half lives in the final third of the recording. You have also heard that more than one cause is mentioned, which confirms your prediction for question 1. Nothing is written and you now know where both answers are.
You write: ازدحام, النمو السكاني, عدد السيارات, في المقام الأول, ضعف النقل العام, مسارات للحافلات, رفع رسوم وقوف, تحسن طفيف, ساعات الذروة, لم يتغير. Ten words and the whole answer is in them. في المقام الأول is flagged because it is the marker question 1 needs; تحسن طفيف and لم يتغير are flagged because they are the evaluation question 2 asks for and they point in different directions.
Replay the stretch around في المقام الأول: does it attach to ضعف النقل العام or to عدد السيارات? Suppose it attaches to ضعف النقل العام — then the multiple-choice answer is the weakness of public transport, and the larger, more obvious cause of car numbers is a distractor. Then replay the evaluation: تحسن طفيف في ساعات الذروة، غير أن زمن الرحلة في بقية اليوم لم يتغير. Both uncertainties resolved, and neither required hearing the rest again.
اتخذت البلدية إجراءين: خصصت مسارات للحافلات، ورفعت رسوم وقوف السيارات. وأما أثر المسارات فيصفه التقرير بأنه تحسن طفيف في ساعات الذروة فقط، إذ يقول إن زمن الرحلة في بقية اليوم لم يتغير. Exactly two measures, numbered by إجراءين. The evaluation is attributed to the report — يصفه التقرير, يقول إن — because the question said كما يعرضه التقرير. And طفيف, slight, is preserved rather than upgraded.
Check: إجراءين is a dual accusative object of اتخذت, so ين and not ان. خصصت and رفعت agree with البلدية, feminine singular. رسوم وقوف السيارات is a three-term chain, so رسوم and وقوف carry no article. لم يتغير is لم plus the jussive. And طفيف must still be there. Five checks, and each of them is a mark that the listening had already earned and that careless writing could still lose.
Result: اتخذت البلدية إجراءين: خصصت مسارات للحافلات، ورفعت رسوم وقوف السيارات. وأما أثر المسارات فيصفه التقرير بأنه تحسن طفيف في ساعات الذروة فقط، إذ يقول إن زمن الرحلة في بقية اليوم لم يتغير
Typical mistakes
Active revision
درب الطريقة على تسجيل عربي مدته أربع دقائق: اقرأ أربعة أسئلة أولا، ثم استمع مرة بلا قلم، ثم مرة بكلمات مفردة فقط، ثم أعد تشغيل مقطعين فقط. اكتب الإجابات بالعربية في عشر دقائق، وخصص خمس دقائق أخيرة للمراجعة اللغوية وحدها. سجل بعد كل تدريب ما الذي التقطته في المرة الثانية ولم تلتقطه في الأولى
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
This is a constructed drill, not a report about any real programme; its only purpose is to make you handle numerals under listening conditions. أعلنت الوزارة أن عدد المشاركين في البرنامج بلغ ثلاثة آلاف وسبعمئة وخمسين طالبا، أي بزيادة قدرها اثنان وعشرون في المئة عن العام الماضي. وقالت إن البرنامج سيمتد إلى إحدى عشرة مدينة بدلا من ثماني مدن، وإن التسجيل يبدأ في الخامس عشر من الشهر المقبل ولا يستمر أكثر من ثلاثة أسابيع. Extract every number and say what grammar told you what.
Three thousand seven hundred and fifty students. Three decisions are audible. آلاف is the plural of ألف, masculine, so the numeral carries ة: ثلاثة. The compound is read in descending order with و between each element, exactly as in English but with the conjunction obligatory. And the counted noun طالبا is an accusative singular, because the final element of the compound, خمسين, is above ten — the noun agrees with the last element, not with the largest one. That single rule resolves most long numbers.
An increase amounting to twenty-two per cent. قدرها, its amount being, is a fixed way of attaching a figure to a noun and is worth recognising instantly. اثنان وعشرون is nominative because it is the predicate of the implied clause, and note that اثنان agrees like a dual rather than taking polarity. في المئة is per cent, and المائة is an alternative spelling of the same word that you will also see.
Eleven cities instead of eight. Two different numeral systems in one clause. إحدى عشرة is the feminine form of eleven, telling you the noun is feminine before you hear مدينة, and the noun is an accusative singular. ثماني مدن is the three-to-ten system: مدينة is feminine, so the numeral takes the unmarked masculine form ثماني, and the noun is a genitive plural مدن. If you heard ثمانية you would know a masculine noun was coming.
On the fifteenth of next month. Days of the month use ordinals, and الخامس عشر is the masculine ordinal because اليوم is understood. من الشهر المقبل is genitive after من, with المقبل, coming or next, as its adjective. Note that Arabic says the fifteenth of the month rather than the fifteenth day, and that a recording naming a month may use the international name, the Levantine name or an Islamic month, all of which Appendix 2 covers.
And does not last more than three weeks. لا with the imperfect is a plain present negative and it is the easiest thing in this sentence to miss, because it is one syllable and it inverts the meaning. أكثر من is more than. ثلاثة أسابيع follows the polarity rule again: أسبوع is masculine, so the numeral carries ة, and the noun is a genitive plural. Three numbers, three different systems, one negative — and the negative is the one worth the most.
بلغ عدد المشاركين ثلاثة آلاف وسبعمئة وخمسين طالبا، بزيادة اثنين وعشرين في المئة عن العام الماضي. وسيمتد البرنامج من ثماني مدن إلى إحدى عشرة، ويبدأ التسجيل في الخامس عشر من الشهر المقبل ولا يزيد على ثلاثة أسابيع. Note بزيادة اثنين, genitive after the preposition, where the recording had the nominative اثنان — the case changes with the syntax and copying the heard form blindly would be an error. And لا يزيد على preserves the negative that the original carried.
Result: بلغ عدد المشاركين ثلاثة آلاف وسبعمئة وخمسين طالبا، بزيادة اثنين وعشرين في المئة عن العام الماضي. وسيمتد البرنامج من ثماني مدن إلى إحدى عشرة، ويبدأ التسجيل في الخامس عشر من الشهر المقبل ولا يزيد على ثلاثة أسابيع
Typical mistakes
Active revision
سجل لنفسك عشر جمل عربية تحتوي على أعداد وتواريخ وأسماء ونفي، واستمع إليها بعد أسبوع واكتبها. ثم قارن: كم عددا أخطأت في تذكيره أو تأنيثه، وكم تاريخا فاتك، وكم نفيا لم تسمعه. كرر التدريب على الفئة التي أخطأت فيها أكثر
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
The Section B recording is an interview about whether traditional crafts can survive commercially. The guest argues that they can, but only where restoration and heritage programmes create demand, and concedes that individual workshops rarely survive on tourist sales alone. Write 5(a), and write it so that it is still usable forty minutes later.
The question asks for the different points of view in the source, so the answer must be about positions rather than about crafts. Start with the position: يرى الضيف أن الحرف التقليدية يمكن أن تستمر تجاريا، ولكن بشرط واحد. Announcing that there is a condition, before saying what it is, mirrors the structure of the guest's own argument and guarantees that the condition survives into your notes.
وهو أن يوجد طلب تخلقه برامج الترميم والتراث، لا مجرد إقبال سياحي. أن يوجد is a subjunctive after أن. تخلقه برامج is a relative clause with no pronoun after the indefinite طلب, with the resumptive ه on the verb. لا مجرد, not merely, sets the contrast the guest drew. Notice that the summary now carries the mechanism, which means it can be argued from in 5(c) rather than merely cited.
ويقر بأن الورش الفردية نادرا ما تستمر بالاعتماد على مبيعات السياح وحدها. أقر بأن, concedes that, marks the epistemic status. نادرا ما plus an imperfect is the idiom for rarely. وحدها, alone, agrees with مبيعات. If you record this as one of his arguments rather than as a concession, then in 5(c) you will misrepresent his position, and the AO1 grid marks understanding of the spoken source.
Three sentences: position, condition, concession. That is the content of the source and further sentences add nothing to a points-based mark. Time saved here is time available for 5(c), which is where the levels-based grids and two thirds of the section's marks are. The discipline of stopping when the points are made is genuinely hard and worth practising deliberately.
Ask one question of what you have written: could I argue from this in forty minutes without hearing the recording again? Here, yes — you have a claim, a stated condition, and a conceded limit, which is enough to compare against the written source and to take a position on. If your 5(a) reads as a list of nouns about crafts, the answer is no, and you would have to reconstruct the argument from memory while also writing it.
In 5(c) the reuse looks like this: يقول الضيف في التسجيل إن استمرار الحرف مشروط بوجود طلب تخلقه برامج الترميم، وهو شرط يتفق مع ما يذكره النص المكتوب عن ارتفاع تكاليف المواد التقليدية. The label يقول الضيف في التسجيل earns the AO1 credit; ما يذكره النص المكتوب earns the AO2 credit; and يتفق مع is the verb that makes it an evaluation rather than two summaries side by side.
Result: يرى الضيف أن الحرف التقليدية يمكن أن تستمر تجاريا، ولكن بشرط واحد: وهو أن يوجد طلب تخلقه برامج الترميم والتراث، لا مجرد إقبال سياحي. ويقر بأن الورش الفردية نادرا ما تستمر بالاعتماد على مبيعات السياح وحدها
Typical mistakes
Active revision
ابحث عن تسجيل عربي ونص مكتوب في الموضوع نفسه. لخص وجهة نظر كل مصدر في جملتين عربيتين فقط، ثم اكتب تقييما من مئتي كلمة تستعمل فيه المصدرين بوضوح وتنسب كل معلومة إلى مصدرها. خصص الدقائق العشر الأخيرة للمطابقة وأواخر الأفعال والإضافات
Active recall
Recall the key points — then reveal.
Sources: Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Arabic (9AA0) specification (Pearson Edexcel)
References & sources